Isn’t it? I think that’s tied up in it.
In fact I wouldn’t be surprised if someone paid off the company to ‘receive’ the letter late.
Not saying that he has done that mind. But I wouldn’t be surprised if someone did
Beckham
- Thread starter box2box
- Start date
- Status
Isn’t it? I think that’s tied up in it.
In fact I wouldn’t be surprised if someone paid off the company to ‘receive’ the letter late.
Not saying that he has done that mind. But I wouldn’t be surprised if someone did
If the court of law dictates no fine and no points that's the end of it. The fact you suggest it wouldn't be surprising if someone was paid to send the letter late just says to me that theres absolutely no reasoning with you.
Billy2Sheds
Winger
Seriously I got fined £100 for an offence in March 2017 got the letter in July - paid the twat - should I challenge this or is it too late?
No worries mate. I suppose the concept of lateness is a fuzzy one to you, all things considered.
No idea what you mean to be honest but ok no problem.
Goat Eyes
Striker
Too late... But aye, it’s absolutely 14 days for the initial letter.
You’re the bloke who runs a successful business that opens and closes when it wants iirc with little regard for proper opening and closing times.
Na wrong person mate.
You said in this thread you run several businesses and sometimes close your takeaway early
why do Chinese shut earlier than everyone else?
People saying he should just pay it
Why should he 'just pay it ? Because hes rich and famous ? Its been proven in a court of law that he doesnt need to do anything.
He wanted to squirm out of the offence so went to this bloke who then thought this is the easiest £100k I'll ever make.
I accept it's the law, but the 14 day limit is totally arbitrary and the fact remains that (a) he committed the offence and (b) he paid someone to get him off the hook. If it hadn't been the 14 day limit then it would have been some bullshit: busting for a shite or trying to get away from paparazzi.
Billy2Sheds
Winger
Thanks mate I’ll know shoukd it happen again first time ever been caught driving for years - 46 in a 40 (shields road bypass where they hide above you which again I think is technically illegal/ not allowed). I’m not saying speeding is right but absolutely no danger to public there no pedestrians anywhere near - just a money making exercise and they can’t even do the bureaucracy correctly..
The take away does often shut early on a very quiet night. Thats totally different to your previous post suggesting it opens and closes whenever it likes with little regard to times.
Goat Eyes
Striker
When you go on a speed awareness they point you to a website which shows you that every place where there’s a camera there’s been an accident.
girojim
Striker
Depends on the reason, I appealed one once as I got it months later but it turned out I hadnt updated DVLA with my address so I was at fault and was opening myself up to another potential fine
No ive already stated you were wrong. Have a good evening.
box2box
Striker
Agree, the court has determined he has no charge because of a technicality. Fact remains though he was driving 59 in a 40 which is pretty poor form from anyone, could probably do with a speed awareness course....
I will. Until the end of the evening at 00:00, or maybe 23:30. Who knows?
You ought to be on The Chase with your memory. That's a top piece of work to dig that up.
Fanny Schmelar!
- Status
