Beckham



njmackem said:
Would you have just paid the fine? Or would you if possible have tried to get out of it??
Click to expand...
Obviously try to get off.

What gets me though is when they act as if they didn’t do it. He got off on a technicality not on the fact that he did nothing wrong.
 
Goat Eyes said:
Obviously try to get off.

What gets me though is when they act as if they didn’t do it. He got off on a technicality not on the fact that he did nothing wrong.
Click to expand...

Beckham accepted he was in the wrong, the only thing he fought on was the fact that the notice wasn't received in a timely manner.
 
Goat Eyes said:
Obviously try to get off.

What gets me though is when they act as if they didn’t do it. He got off on a technicality not on the fact that he did nothing wrong.
Click to expand...

He has admitted to speeding, he isn't getting convicted because the coppers fucked up. I've appealed a fine on the 14 day rule before. It's not a technicality it's the rules not being followed correctly
 
girojim said:
He has admitted to speeding, he isn't getting convicted because the coppers fucked up. I've appealed a fine on the 14 day rule before. It's not a technicality it's the rules not being followed correctly
Click to expand...
Well I know that... What I was saying, which was more of a general point, is that they’ll often come out of it as if they’ve done nothing wrong.

njmackem said:
Beckham accepted he was in the wrong, the only thing he fought on was the fact that the notice wasn't received in a timely manner.
Click to expand...
 
njmackem said:
Would you have just paid the fine? Or would you if possible have tried to get out of it??
Click to expand...


See your point, difference is I don’t represent children’s charities etc

Why not take the rap, go on you tube explaining the virtues of considerate driving. Loads are killed every year from RTAs.......
 
It was sent well within the 14 days iirc.

The dispute was about when it was received and proving it was sent by the correct method to get there in 14 I think? They claim it arrived on 15 I think

Either way, total gonk not taking it.
 
box2box said:
See your point, difference is I don’t represent children’s charities etc

Why not take the rap, go on you tube explaining the virtues of considerate driving. Loads are killed every year from RTAs.......
Click to expand...


Don't represent charities because he broke the speed limit :lol:
f***ing hell man
 
HABA87 said:
It was sent well within the 14 days iirc.

The dispute was about when it was received and proving it was sent by the correct method to get there in 14 I think? They claim it arrived on 15 I think

Either way, total gonk not taking it.
Click to expand...
It was a loaner car, and the company responsible for it tagged the mail as received om day 15... It's not even like Beckham was the one receiving the letter...
 

Back
Top