9/11 - Europhysics report

Status
Not open for further replies.

daveydavey

Striker
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf

I understand this has been done many times, and it’s a bit old hat. But please read the above Euro Physics report which concludes this was staged. So I expect people to laugh or think they’ve won the argument...but just read it.

Eventually, people will accept this as fact - and wonder why, for so long, people didn’t accept it.

Please don’t chime in until you have read.
 


You haven’t read the Snopes article that thoroughly debunks what you posted...
A website that trades on its reputation for “debunking” conspiracies would have nothing to gain by discrediting this report would it?

The report is 2 years old, of course I’ve read the snopes report - but you can easily find enough dirt on snopes to not even read that website anymore. Jesus.
 
As a civil engineer, I’d expect you to understand the implication - but quite clearly you haven’t read it so why even bother chipping in?
I did read it. Just can't believe that they are suggesting it was a controlled explosion simply because their calcs show the twin towers wouldn't have collapsed due to burning aviation fuel alone.

They have chosen to ignore any other evidence.
 
A website that trades on its reputation for “debunking” conspiracies would have nothing to gain by discrediting this report would it?

The report is 2 years old, of course I’ve read the snopes report - but you can easily find enough dirt on snopes to not even read that website anymore. Jesus.

So you’re saying that you’re ignoring a website because you think it’s rubbish yet expect everyone on here to read an already debunked website when they think it’s rubbish? Mmmmkay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top