9/11 - Europhysics report

Rizla said:
Do you really think if it was staged, the thousands of people who would have been involved would have kept their mouths shut?

There would have been thousands of Edward Snowdons. It's time this shit was put to bed.
Click to expand...
Talk me through why "thousands" of people needed to be involved mate?
 


daveydavey said:
Talk me through why "thousands" of people needed to be involved mate?
Click to expand...
Think about it for one moment.
  • People to rig multiple buildings with explosives and not be detected. That is a serious undertaking requiring considerable expertise.
  • People in the airports and airlines to go along with it on the knowledge thousands of people were going to die.
  • People at various levels within Government to be aware and sanction it
  • People in the military to go along with it.
  • Relatives and associates of the terrorists and Bin Laden to go along with it.
  • People in the Saudi Government to go along with it.
The list is endless mate, and then you've got the families and associates of all those people.

Do you not think one person would have spoken out in the past 17 years, especially in the light of Edward Snowdon.

Just think about it, it is absolutely impossible.
 
Tbf, all they had to do was, get a load of passports to frame the hijackers, pay off a load of flight instructors to say they'd trained them in flying planes, fake cctv footage of the framed hijackers at the airports, plant explosives all over the twin towers, pay off all the air traffic controllers who monitored the flights before the hijacks and then afterwards, fake the recordings from the hijackers in the cockpit, ensure the planes that hit the towers were controlled remotely, get rid of all the passengers (after forcing them to make calls to their loved ones), keep some bits of them to plant at the crash sites, get a missile to look like a plane then fire it into the pentagon (again this missile is filled with parts of a missing plane, and it's passengers).....

Think about it think about it again. And then again. Then have a f***ing word with yaself ffs.
 
Statement from EDP, the people behind EPN, admitting it's speculation and purely meant to create discussion. They also distanced themselves from it and clearly stated twice that it isn't peer-reviewed.


Logon or register to see this image


Apparently they wrote a follow-up article in November that seems to have been erased from the internet.
 
citybythesea said:
There'll always be small uncertainty why the north and south towers collapsed. You've probably need to accept the official collapse explanation.
However WT 7 tower collapse is very strange whichever way you look at it.
Not hit by a plane and the fires were not throughout the building yet it still collapsed. It certainly remains unexplained and casts doubt on the whole events
Click to expand...

They were hit by planes flown full pelt into towers built with a central core, to maximise space, which was badly damaged by said planes.

Canny smart of them to bring down the second tower to be hit first, to throw us all of the scent.

look out piano said:
Well, I definitely saw 1 plane hit and 2 towers fall live, I'm open minded about the rest tbh.
Click to expand...

I saw two planes hit two towers. Like most did. Once you accept that you accept a plane also hit the pentagon. We'll unless you're a nutter who thinks instead of a third plane they thought fuck it, let's use a missile instead, just for the crack. Or perhaps the twin towers attack was real and the government were waiting to join in!? Ffs man :lol:
 
Last edited:
Rizla said:
Think about it for one moment.
  • People to rig multiple buildings with explosives and not be detected. That is a serious undertaking requiring considerable expertise.
  • People in the airports and airlines to go along with it on the knowledge thousands of people were going to die.
  • People at various levels within Government to be aware and sanction it
  • People in the military to go along with it.
  • Relatives and associates of the terrorists and Bin Laden to go along with it.
  • People in the Saudi Government to go along with it.
The list is endless mate, and then you've got the families and associates of all those people.

Do you not think one person would have spoken out in the past 17 years, especially in the light of Edward Snowdon.

Just think about it, it is absolutely impossible.
Click to expand...
I accept the first one would need some consideration, but the rest...nowhere near hundreds let alone thousands need to know about it.
 
dangermows said:
They were hit by planes flown full pelt into towers built with a central core, to maximise space, which was badly damaged by said planes.

Canny smart of them to bring down the second tower to be hit first, to throw us all of the scent.



I saw two planes hit two towers. Like most did. Once you accept that you accept a plane also hit the pentagon. We'll unless you're a nutter who thinks instead of a third plane they thought fuck it, let's use a missile instead, just for the crack.
Click to expand...
 
dangermows said:
They were hit by planes flown full pelt into towers built with a central core, to maximise space, which was badly damaged by said planes.

Canny smart of them to bring down the second tower to be hit first, to throw us all of the scent.



I saw two planes hit two towers. Like most did. Once you accept that you accept a plane also hit the pentagon. We'll unless you're a nutter who thinks instead of a third plane they thought fuck it, let's use a missile instead, just for the crack. Or perhaps the twin towers attack was real and the government were waiting to join in!? Ffs man :lol:
Click to expand...
Not sure about the missile thing, very little footage or witnesses to the Pentagon attack tbh. And how did you see both planes hit - as most news footage started after the first one had hit tbf.
 
dangermows said:
They were hit by planes flown full pelt into towers built with a central core, to maximise space, which was badly damaged by said planes.

Canny smart of them to bring down the second tower to be hit first, to throw us all of the scent.



I saw two planes hit two towers. Like most did. Once you accept that you accept a plane also hit the pentagon. We'll unless you're a nutter who thinks instead of a third plane they thought fuck it, let's use a missile instead, just for the crack. Or perhaps the twin towers attack was real and the government were waiting to join in!? Ffs man :lol:
Click to expand...
Think he questioned building 7 mate which you've ignored.

But moving on...how do two towers which were hit at different heights, at different speeds, with different fuel bearing loads, which burnt for differing times, fall in identical fashion...in a manner which has never been seen before or after. Indeed, the only time building have ever collapsed in that manner is when demolished.

ProfessionalMackem said:
It's the only critical thing to do with such things marra. Plenty form opinions without having digested the content. Bad form
Click to expand...
And yet the people who read & read are the ones made out to be jokers...
 
daveydavey said:
Three buildings collapse - two in circumstances never ever seen before when considered in contect of the official explanation. The third collapsing for no reason at all.

All three buildings collapse in exactly the same way, two of which were hit at different levels, at different speeds, with different levels of fuel and burning under different amounts of time....and the third colapsing for no reason at all. And yet it's accepted as gospel planes caused all three collapses...just look at the facts for fuck sake.
Click to expand...

People said that tower blocks couldn't fall because of fire and not in that manner (straight down), which has been proved bollocks.

It would take some high ranking whistleblower to change people's minds and even then, people won't believe.
 

Back
Top