Proper fitted up.I think they reckon he never once claimed responsibility.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Proper fitted up.I think they reckon he never once claimed responsibility.
Clearly.I have absolutely no idea what point you’re trying to make here? You’ve just told me how the building collapsed, when I know how the building collapsed, or am I missing something?
I'm a member of the flat earth society. We are getting bigger, we now have members all around the globe.I lose track... which is the number 1 conspiracy on here? 9/11, the moon not being real or the Earth being flat?
I'm a member of the flat earth society. We are getting bigger, we now have members all around the globe.
Shit, hoisted by my own petard.Not across it? A knar
Clearly.
Nist initially went with the pancake theory as a reason for the collapse, then renounced it in 2004/5 then hypothesised a new theory which is basically the 'pancake theory' in all but name, which is still criticised as being 'fatally flawed.'
There's not a chance 95 floors, below the impact, suppported by 47 steel columns, could collapse, literally sieve through itself in 11 seconds. "It's Beyond imagination."
Most of the fuel ignited on impact. The tower burnt for 1 hour 40 then fell at near free fall speed.It’s not beyond imagination at all?
Burning fuel found its way into the main cores. This weakened more than just the floors above the impacts
Most of the fuel ignited on impact. The tower burnt for 1 hour 40 then fell at near free fall speed.
Nah, surely there had to be more resistance.
Most of the fuel ignited on impact. The tower burnt for 1 hour 40 then fell at near free fall speed.
Nah, surely there had to be more resistance.
Most of the fuel ignited on impact. The tower burnt for 1 hour 40 then fell at near free fall speed.
Nah, surely there had to be more resistance.