• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

4th test Manchester


FatCat2402 said:
Sorry I don't understand. How can the fielder and the batsman both have benefit of the doubt. It always used to be towards the batsman
Click to expand...
If the umpire gave the soft signal as out then it was in favour of the bowler/fielder and if gave it not out the favour of batsman.

Then if it was inconclusive on the technology via third umpire. Then it would stay with the soft signal.
Ghfd said:
Strange how wood bowled 4 got the wicket and then didn’t cone out and bowl again

I thought we would have seen Woakes and wood in tandem
Click to expand...
The only logic is they hoped with the ball still a bit newer. Then the other 3 more in the game.

But he had his tail right up. So a missed opportunity.
 
Last edited:
mackembhoy said:
If the umpire gave the soft signal as out then it was in favour of the bowler/fielder and if gave it not out the favour of batsman.

Then if it was inconclusive on the technology via third umpire. Then it would stay with the soft signal.
Click to expand...


Yes, I know that but given the soft signal no longer exists are we back to how it always used to be i.e., benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman
 
England have gave themselves the best chance at winning and if it's not to be, so be it.

Still think England are heavy favourites and just need a couple more tonight ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top