24 Hours in police custody



Sandboy said:
Obviously a bit of twat but he got his man off. All a bit of a non event really as the murderer was already dead himself
Click to expand...
He will appeal to a certian section of society

JAZZMANB said:
Like Gareth from The Office,daft thing was you could see him wincing in the interview as it was clear he was up to his neck in it.
Click to expand...
I think it was his smugness knowing that the bloke 99.9% knew exactly what had happened but due to time all potential forensics to implicate him were gone. The fact he nearly dropped himself in it by almost answering a question until smug one piped up
 
JAZZMANB said:
Last two been a bit poor imo
expected more
Click to expand...

I thought last nights was good albeit not exactly from the custody/interview point of view, more the forensic investigation side. I have used the 'bone experts' from dundee for advice once and they are fantastic at what they do and what they know. It was also nice for her remains to be found so she could finally be buried.

The solicitor was so annoying, most of them are. To be honest though with the same evidence available I would have advised the same if I was in his position. Generally an innocent person will freely tell you what happened or what they know, a no comment interview is generally from someone who has something to hide, it's just in this case there was no evidence to put to him other than it was found in his garden. He was never going to get convicted on the back of that
 
duff_man said:
I thought last nights was good albeit not exactly from the custody/interview point of view, more the forensic investigation side. I have used the 'bone experts' from dundee for advice once and they are fantastic at what they do and what they know. It was also nice for her remains to be found so she could finally be buried.

The solicitor was so annoying, most of them are. To be honest though with the same evidence available I would have advised the same if I was in his position. Generally an innocent person will freely tell you what happened or what they know, a no comment interview is generally from someone who has something to hide, it's just in this case there was no evidence to put to him other than it was found in his garden. He was never going to get convicted on the back of that
Click to expand...
Seemed like a delightful family
 
duff_man said:
I thought last nights was good albeit not exactly from the custody/interview point of view, more the forensic investigation side. I have used the 'bone experts' from dundee for advice once and they are fantastic at what they do and what they know. It was also nice for her remains to be found so she could finally be buried.

The solicitor was so annoying, most of them are. To be honest though with the same evidence available I would have advised the same if I was in his position. Generally an innocent person will freely tell you what happened or what they know, a no comment interview is generally from someone who has something to hide, it's just in this case there was no evidence to put to him other than it was found in his garden. He was never going to get convicted on the back of that
Click to expand...
Made me think what the coppers were doing in 2003 mind
 
Sandboy said:
Made me think what the coppers were doing in 2003 mind
Click to expand...

True. Reading between the lines it was reported as a missing person with the belief she had run away from an abusive relationship, bit strange not to make enquiries at her last known address and not see a freshly moved pile of earth and rubbish
 
duff_man said:
I thought last nights was good albeit not exactly from the custody/interview point of view, more the forensic investigation side. I have used the 'bone experts' from dundee for advice once and they are fantastic at what they do and what they know. It was also nice for her remains to be found so she could finally be buried.

The solicitor was so annoying, most of them are. To be honest though with the same evidence available I would have advised the same if I was in his position. Generally an innocent person will freely tell you what happened or what they know, a no comment interview is generally from someone who has something to hide, it's just in this case there was no evidence to put to him other than it was found in his garden. He was never going to get convicted on the back of that
Click to expand...
I have no issue with the way it rolled,the past episodes and series have all been quite similar where there's a tense minute by minute story which keeps you engrossed.The last couple have been okay but more routine shall we say

Sandboy said:
Obviously a bit of twat but he got his man off. All a bit of a non event really as the murderer was already dead himself
Click to expand...

Says who,The deaf dumb blind kid ?
 

Back
Top