Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It couldn’t be any clearer cut. And I’m not ‘trying to make out‘ anything.That's misleading. That's only the numbers from 2020.
It's also not as clear cut as you try and make out because they're based on any entry on the death certificate.
No other underlying causes does not exclude conditions that can be caused by covid leading to death, such as heart failure or cardiac arrhythmias.
Who he? It’s the ONS.He does appear to have "disappeared" 133,000 dead people.
Who said there wasn’t. Google straw man matey.Unfortunately there's millions of people in the country with underlying health conditions.
What? ‘Sub text’?! Very strange.There’s a definite ‘I’m alright Jack’ subtext going on with his post.
You're trying to make it's clear cut. It isn'tIt couldn’t be any clearer cut. And I’m not ‘trying to make out‘ anything.
Uv gotta funny definition of crass. The information speaks for itself, can’t u read? A disease has killed Around a tenth of the annual cancer deaths
Hoy up a link then.Who he? It’s the ONS.
It is clear cut. It couldn’t be any ‘clearer cut’ Do u no speekee Dee eenglish? *I’m* not saying anything. I’m simply quoting ONS figures. I’m not lying, I’m quoting ONS. I don’t know why ur spouting this nonsense , methinks ur defensiveness & ‘crassness’, to coin a phrase popliar on this thread, indicates u have an axe to grind.You're trying to make it's clear cut. It isn't
You said it was the total number of people with underlying causes - it isn't, that's a lie or you're sharing misinformation.
The numbers are obtained from death certificates and are classed as no underlying causes if there isn't anything additional entered in section one or section two.
Section one of the MCCD includes all things leading to death.
Covid is known for causing massive strain on the heart. If a persons with no underlying health condition went to hospital with covid and it affected their heart, they died, and it was identified on their MCCD they would not be included in the no underlying causes.
What u on about? I’ve done better than a link. I’ve posted what they said.Hoy up a link then.
reminds me of the whole Aids thing, Aids never killed anyone it caused other illness to do the damage, So dying from a cold with Aids is a way to explain it. without the Aids the person likely wouldn't have died from a cold.That would mean cancer kills 1.5m a year which is 3x times the total deaths a year. Are people coming back from the dead?
Just because someone has diabetes or a dicky ticker doesn't mean covid hasn't killed them
App Opp parent my this isn’t ‘crass’ . Go figure.Why would you even think he is suggesting that?
Just with idiots and crap internet characters sharing bullshitindicates u have an axe to grind.
True. It'd also help if the OP understood that the stat is about underlying causes, not pre existing conditions. There's a subtle but significant difference.As ever with these type of threads, this is absurd. A meaningless statistic.
It becomes a bit more meaningful if it’s provided with some context of what percentage of the nation’s population has an underlying health condition. I’d hazard a guess that that’d be quite high. A good percentage of the population will be deemed as being clinically obese or have diagnoses of conditions such as asthma, diabetes or epilepsy; all manageable health conditions that people can live with and have active lifestyles with until very old age.
*apparentlyApp Opp parent my this isn’t ‘crass’ . Go figure.
What u on about? I’ve done better than a link. I’ve posted what they said.
Just with idiots and crap internet characters sharing bullshit
Maths not ur strong point?That would mean cancer kills 1.5m a year which is 3x times the total deaths a year. Are people coming back from the dead?
Just because someone has diabetes or a dicky ticker doesn't mean covid hasn't killed them
Look, if u want to think ONS figures are some sort of conspiracy then go right ahead. By the way ‘denier’ is so passé...But put the link up anyway. Otherwise some people might think you're just re-posting shite from your denier Facey group. (Not me of course. Naturally I'll take your word for it. )
Maths not ur strong point?
Look, if u want to think ONS figures are some sort of conspiracy then go right ahead. By the way ‘denier’ is so passé...
That for the vast majority of people this wasn’t an issue to worry about. It was always about protecting the vulnerable from the start.What else do you think he’s suggesting? It’s your standard “COVID is being overblown because it’s only killing people who were going to die anyway” post.
So what's clear cut?It couldn’t be any clearer cut. And I’m not ‘trying to make out‘ anything.
"Liar" is so overused though don't you think?Look, if u want to think ONS figures are some sort of conspiracy then go right ahead. By the way ‘denier’ is so passé...
Incorrectly used that’s for sure."Liar" is so overused though don't you think?
Dearie me. Look, if u want to believe ONS figures are a lie then go right ahead. That clear cut enough for u?So what's clear cut?
Clear cut
Your first post is incorrect and misinformed at best, at worst a lie.
No underlying causes does not include people who were otherwise healthy before catching covid but had been clinically coded with other illnesses as a direct result of the illness, like hypertension, myocarditis or renal problems.
Probably, but not clear cut.
You've shared this for some reason and messed up.
Definitely not clear cut
Whatever you're on about when you say "it's clear cut"