AndrewP
Striker
He's older and more experienced. I'm not sure Patto will have a better career though. Time will tell.Correct,Patto is light years ahead of Elborg.
Patto didn't do much wrong for us.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's older and more experienced. I'm not sure Patto will have a better career though. Time will tell.Correct,Patto is light years ahead of Elborg.
It doesnt, but it gives the ball away, which he did regularly, which can do. We have at least two obviously better keepers than him now, time to go.I don’t think you can say putting the ball into touch directly leads to a goal
Getting POTY nominations in L2, then you'd think a Champ club would snap our hands off for him.
I don't even think its a massive jump - I thought he should have went L1 this season, and said so on here. He'd already proved he was good enough for L2, and some.
Correct,Patto is light years ahead of Elborg.
Ellborg needs to adjust to the pace of the game and the press, but otherwise I’ve been pretty impressed so far. Certainly not fazed by a big occasion. I don’t get the criticism really beyond “he’s not as good as Roefs”.
He's older and more experienced. I'm not sure Patto will have a better career though. Time will tell.
Patto didn't do much wrong for us.
Patto did make match winning saves. No better example than the playoff final. I’d go as far as to say that he’s capable of saves that none of the rest of them can match. The one against Ipswich the other week was genuinely astounding. However I think you nailed it that Roefs wins us points by being such a strong all-round keeper. He has very few weaknesses. For what we are now as a club it’s such an important foundation. Last thing on Patto, it’s not that he’s bad with ball at feet as he’s often tagged on here. He’s just overconfident in my view.This is a good shout. It’s obvious that ellborg is completely out of depth with the pace of the game. He want to take two seconds more and is often exposed.
He will soon out that behind him as he grows to the game.
Pattison didn’t do much wrong, however, he didn’t win us points. In the championship keepers win team points.
He was replaced by a keeper who wins games by outstanding overall performances and we didn’t see that in patto consistently throughout the season hence why he is not currently with us.
He also wasn’t tested with a consistent back up. He put weight on during the season which was noticed by all. It appeared he became complacent.
Be interesting his next move. Wish him well though.
I think Patto might be able to get better too. Still young for a keeperPatto did make match winning saves. No better example than the playoff final. I’d go as far as to say that he’s capable of saves that none of the rest of them can match. The one against Ipswich the other week was genuinely astounding. However I think you nailed it that Roefs wins us points by being such a strong all-round keeper. He has very few weaknesses. For what we are now as a club it’s such an important foundation. Last thing on Patto, it’s not that he’s bad with ball at feet as he’s often tagged on here. He’s just overconfident in my view.
For Young, you have to imagine that next year is at least one year too early for his pal prospects. Means that losing Roefs in the summer would be extra awkward. Hopefully Ellborg makes a leap over the summer and at least functions as a solid bridge for a year or two.
This is a good shout. It’s obvious that ellborg is completely out of depth with the pace of the game. He want to take two seconds more and is often exposed.
He will soon out that behind him as he grows to the game.
Pattison didn’t do much wrong, however, he didn’t win us points. In the championship keepers win team points.
He was replaced by a keeper who wins games by outstanding overall performances and we didn’t see that in patto consistently throughout the season hence why he is not currently with us.
He also wasn’t tested with a consistent back up. He put weight on during the season which was noticed by all. It appeared he became complacent.
Be interesting his next move. Wish him well though.
Who?Roefs number 1 (under the assumption Chelsea dont spunk their load on him)
Thats why, also if Chelsea use Penders as a make weight for deal he'll be number 1
People will deny it but some of our fans aren’t keen on a local lad done good. Roefs has been amazing for us, but at the start of the season I was quite happy for Patterson to be given a go.
Mike Penders who was rumour of player to make weight in the deal, who is ultimately younger than Roefs and from my mates who support Chelsea he is the long term number 1 if they don't get RoefsWho?
RichardsonHere's the keeper situation from my POV
Roefs - No.1 next year if we keep him, undoubtedly.
Ellborg - No.2 next year
Patto - Sell, but not due to him not being good enough to be No.2. I think he is currently better than Ellborg but he can't go back to being a No.2 when his stock is reasonably high following good loan spell at Millwall.
Young - Championship loan
Cowan - A full year in U21s with a non league loan for 1-2 months at back end of season.
Richardson
Allen
Cameron
Think I'll support the club on this one as they seem to rate elborg better than patto which is what I also think, don't get me wrong patto is a very good championship player but will never make it in the PL.
Elborg is the better keeper
Made some good saves and looks comfortable enough. Roefs looks absolutely outstanding tbf, which is why he's beinv linked to big clubs.and will have a better career overall.I don’t think we have seen anywhere enough of Mellborg to make that judgement yet. He’s done reasonably well but hasn’t immediately stood out like Roefs in terms of ability.
I swear the hardest job in football is to be the back up/ replacement to an outstanding player/ players.Ellborg needs to adjust to the pace of the game and the press, but otherwise I’ve been pretty impressed so far. Certainly not fazed by a big occasion. I don’t get the criticism really beyond “he’s not as good as Roefs”.