• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Jack Clarke


Mowgli said:
'his replacement could already be here' is keep being peddled out as a positive. To me that's just replacing one of the best players in the league with one who can't even get in our team.

Accepting a fee less than acceptable and trying to peddle it as good in the media just makes it worse.
Click to expand...
People kidding themselves any of them donkeys on our bench are fit to replace
Him are living in a world of their own like
 
Hot Since 82 said:
That valuation is simply so low that it is far better we hang on to him and try to get into the PL ourselves this season, with the attendant riches it delivers.
Click to expand...

the owners have no intention of actually going for it in terms of promotion. it'll more be a happy accident if we go up

get the impression they're quite happy to kick about in this league spending as little as possible and if we happen to challenge for promotion great but if we don't it's all good provided we don't get relegated
 
Twitter admin in their wisdom tweeting photos of the players in training, creating engagement from desperate fans begging to see Clarke.
 
Have to say I was enjoying the new Californian Jack Clarke after we had a while with the Lloyd Christmas Jack Clarke. Seems a shame for him to go now.
 
Nelson! said:
There is no way we would base the additional on their survival. It will be like RS, just a delayed payment.

And that’s completely ignoring we have reportedly rejected it anyway. Easy to get sucked into negativity if you want to.
Click to expand...
What's the basis of the deferral for RS, simply an elapsed period of time or specific number of games played?
 
Mowgli said:
Using that logic then if he's as allegedly happy as people say then why isn't this being used as a major opportunity to keep him? Talk about a new deal if the only alternative is £15m.

It honestly looks more and more like we want to sell and will for the highest bid we get, regardless of if it hits 20/23m or not.
Click to expand...
I said this from the start of the window, we need to sell to spend and Clarke was the biggest asset to sell
 
Pacific said:
the owners have no intention of actually going for it in terms of promotion. it'll more be a happy accident if we go up

get the impression they're quite happy to kick about in this league spending as little as possible and if we happen to challenge for promotion great but if we don't it's all good provided we don't get relegated
Click to expand...
Please outline the financial incentive for this plan, considering Championship clubs lose money every season.

More conspiracy rubbish that makes zero sense.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top