Put a flat earthier into space

[ajryan86]

I haven't been here for a while... there has been a lot of changes to Physics since I last was on. So when you push a door that says pull why does it not open?

 

[GingerNick]

so do I suck a drink through a straw? or does the atmosphere push it..in which case why doesnt it push it out of the glass in the first place?

 

[What A Waster]

A similar ridiculous claim was made about how his atmospheric stacking was selective which is his replacement theory for gravity acting on structures on the ground.

A small building has less intensive atmosphere stacking than a larger or more dense building.

No explanation on how the atmosphere can recognise the differences between these buildings and could also not provide a reasonable explanation on why a plane flying low over a city isn’t subject to massive turbulence/ effects of varying atmospheric stacking as it flies over varying height buildings.

A while back, I can't remember exactly what i said, but i think i put forward that you'd be heavier at the bottom of a well or a mine shaft because of all the stacking concentrated down the shaft.

Obviously he told me that I was wrong, so i must've been.

 

[payne]

A similar ridiculous claim was made about how his atmospheric stacking was selective which is his replacement theory for gravity acting on structures on the ground.

A small building has less intensive atmosphere stacking than a larger or more dense building.

No explanation on how the atmosphere can recognise the differences between these buildings and could also not provide a reasonable explanation on why a plane flying low over a city isn’t subject to massive turbulence/ effects of varying atmospheric stacking as it flies over varying height buildings.

He's probably having to look deeper to find out.

 

[What A Waster]

so do I suck a drink through a straw? or does the atmosphere push it..in which case why doesnt it push it out of the glass in the first place?

Doesn't even spurt out the straw until you decide to suck it up. Weird

 

[payne]

Doesn't even spurt out the straw until you decide to suck it up. Weird

I think you mean push against the back of your throat to draw the liquid in. Not sure if 'draw' is the correct terminology in the new physical model we're learning so much about.

 

[Nobby]

Bet his lass is relieved he doesn't believe sucking and pulling exist

 

[payne]

countdown is on for the inevitable smash into the dome and drink

You must be logged on to see media items

 

[chelt_mackem]

To push the train.

Can you explain what the engine in this picture is actually pushing on? Given that we can see the locomotive is travelling ahead of the carriages to which it is attached, it would normally be accepted that it's pulling them, so where are we going wrong?

Logon or register to see this image

 

[Nukehasslefan]

so do I suck a drink through a straw? or does the atmosphere push it..in which case why doesnt it push it out of the glass in the first place?

You create a low pressure for the atmosphere to push the water up your straw.

 

[Kevj]

You create a low pressure for the atmosphere to overcome gravity and push the water up your straw.

 

[0verlord44]

Come on Artemis 1!

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Can you explain what the engine in this picture is actually pushing on? Given that we can see the locomotive is travelling ahead of the carriages to which it is attached, it would normally be accepted that it's pulling them, so where are we going wrong?

Logon or register to see this image

Look at many aspects from each point in the loco from the fire to the steam to the rods to the wheels to the couplings on the train carriages and so on. Then look at that transferred to the track.
No pulling anywhere, just push by compression.

Come on Artemis 1!

It makes you wonder why they didn't put those so-called boosters on the Apollo carry-on in the 60s.

 

[payne]

Look at many aspects from each point in the loco from the fire to the steam to the rods to the wheels to the couplings on the train carriages and so on. Then look at that transferred to the track.
No pulling anywhere, just push by compression.

It makes you wonder why they didn't put those so-called boosters on the Apollo carry-on in the 60s.

It's 60 years later and the amount of lies they've had to fabricate over the 6 decades takes up a lot of space on hard drives and files. They are probably using them to get rid of the data in a quick way straight into the drink.

 

[Nobby]

You create a low pressure for the atmosphere to push the water up your straw.

That's called sucking FFS

 

[fyl2u]

That's called sucking FFS

 

[Reid against Mcshane]

It makes you wonder why they didn't put those so-called boosters on the Apollo carry-on in the 60s.

It makes you wonder why my Mam drove a Hillman Imp instead of the Audi she has now

 

[fyl2u]

Can you explain what the engine in this picture is actually pushing on? Given that we can see the locomotive is travelling ahead of the carriages to which it is attached, it would normally be accepted that it's pulling them, so where are we going wrong?

Logon or register to see this image

I was about to stick up for him and say "you know, technically I guess if you zoom in close to the actual coupling between the engine and the first carriage, the rear of the engine coupling could be seen to be 'pushing' the rear of the front carriage coupling..."

But then he comes out with this gibberish...

Look at many aspects from each point in the loco from the fire to the steam to the rods to the wheels to the couplings on the train carriages and so on. Then look at that transferred to the track.
No pulling anywhere, just push by compression.

 

[legend7]

You create a low pressure for the atmosphere to push the water up your straw.

Also known as suction

 

[DaveH]

To push the train.

Look at many aspects from each point in the loco from the fire to the steam to the rods to the wheels to the couplings on the train carriages and so on. Then look at that transferred to the track.
No pulling anywhere, just push by compression.

It makes you wonder why they didn't put those so-called boosters on the Apollo carry-on in the 60s.

Can I just check something, because we had this daft carry on with volume, mass and density. In the end it turned out that you invented your own terms for all those words and just changed language because you didn’t like the original.

Is this what you are doing here and the argument is not it is push or pull, the argument is people are agreeing it is an English pull but a nuke-push, where push means something slightly different in your language?