• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Should do an experiment with groups who walk north as far as they can and groups who walk south. All the people who walk north no matter where they started would hit the area of too cold for man or machine and become frozen if they didn't stop in the flat earth model. Then a bunch aim south (I mean opposite of north), they should send up at all different parts on the outer rim of the disc.

If the earth is a beach ball both groups will be able to keep going past their north and opposite north directions and meet up.
Get 5 groups of people to stand at night in the southern hemisphere, all 5 degrees apart, all looking due south and see if they can all see the southern cross dead ahead (and up). If flat/dome then the answer is no the image will be 25 degrees different for the group at one edge than the other.

If a globe, then they should all see the southern cross ahead, but rotated 25 degrees from one side to the other.

Guess what happens in reality?
 

Get 5 groups of people to stand at night in the southern hemisphere, all 5 degrees apart, all looking due south and see if they can all see the southern cross dead ahead (and up). If flat/dome then the answer is no the image will be 25 degrees different for the group at one edge than the other.

If a globe, then they should all see the southern cross ahead, but rotated 25 degrees from one side to the other.

Guess what happens in reality?
There's only one logical explanation for that. There are 5 Southern Crosses, all 5 degrees apart, but only visible from those specific locations due to atmospheric magnification, demagnification and water level.
 
There's only one logical explanation for that. There are 5 Southern Crosses, all 5 degrees apart, but only visible from those specific locations due to atmospheric magnification, demagnification and water level.
Have you seen the Southern Cross yourself or is this an appeal to authority
 
Have you seen the Southern Cross yourself or is this an appeal to authority
I have only seen it from one location, Brazil, so going by the rules of this thread, I have to appeal to the authority of those who have been to Australia, New Zealand, South Africa or anywhere else it's visible from to know whether it really is.

I'm not sure if this proves or disproves the globe by our learned friend's rules though.
 
I’ve just finished watching a documentary on Amazon Prime called Moonfall which depicted the a mission to the moon by NASA. Whilst this proved the earth isn’t flat, I was utterly gobsmacked to learn the moon is a man made structure powered by a white dwarf.
I’ve been lied to by ‘the man’ and I’ve now had my eyes opened to see the real truth.
 
I have only seen it from one location, Brazil, so going by the rules of this thread, I have to appeal to the authority of those who have been to Australia, New Zealand, South Africa or anywhere else it's visible from to know whether it really is.

I'm not sure if this proves or disproves the globe by our learned friend's rules though.
How do you know what the southern cross is?
 
Don't start him off there are loads of loons all over that too 🤪😂


Jesus wept there are some utter loons on this planet who now have the ability to spread their drivel. Numerology ffs. Also a massive conspiracy costing hundreds of millions of dollars and the people who "died" re-entered society using their old names and nobody noticed.....ffs how stupid can a person be.
 
And it has again descended to a whole new level of idiocy, you can suck anything out of any vessel the plastic bottle collapses because it cannot withstand the external pressure on it when the internal pressure falls.
The reason the internal pressure falls with a plastic bottle is due to pushing away the atmosphere from the opening which then allows the external pressure to crush the bottle by the exact amount you take away from its once level atmospheric resistance.
Your own energy allows that.
If you make the plastic thicker or add vacuum support rings then it will not collapse and you can still suck the air out.
You may as well add in the glass bottle instead because it then becomes a much more resistant and rigid structure to withstand a lower pressure against the higher pressure external to it.
There's still no sucking.
You really have not the first idea what you rattle on about you utter moron.
In your opinion which, as I said before, you're welcome to.
You can look online and see many examples of vessels being damaged by underpressure - we have been through this many times before on this thread and you have been proved wrong repeatedly yet you still spout the same idiocy as if you know more than anyone else.
I haven't been proved wrong on any of it. You saying so means nothing as proof.
You suck an hard boiled egg into a milk bottle by putting a lit match in and then putting the egg tightly in the neck of the bottle - the burning match heats up the air and some will escape past the egg when the match goes out the air cools and contracts and the outside pressure is higher than the inside pressure (guess what everything flows from high to low pressure) and the egg will be sucked into the bottle - this is kid science.
And you'll find the egg is pushed into the bottle because of the lower pressure created inside. It isn't sucked in.

About 35 secs, see how they straighten up and travel in a linear fashion around the middle.

You must be logged on to see media items
Tether the sticks and see what happens.
As I explained above.
I think there's room enough for a space thread and this one because comments like the following deserve a thread of their own -

Turn around.
Oh....


And then....

Or as we know them... other directions.
Unmanipulated. Take a look back seeing as you missed it.
😂

I'm not going north I'm going the opposite way to it.

Not heading north I've turned a quarter to my right of north and now going that way.

Absolutely mental to even deny there's South or west.

"What's opposite of north?"

"Nothing, it's just not north, it doesn't exist, there's only north"
As above.
I agree very brave men insulted by idiots who have read crap on the internet. The Chinese even photographed the landing site a few years back - why would they fake it to help the US
Anywhere where I can see those pictures the Chinese supposedly took of the supposed lunar lander effigy?
So, given that you have established beyond all doubt claimed that there is only one direction, North, lets say I build a circular railway track and have an engine pull a carriage, it would actually be pushing it in a straight line, even though it would clearly be pulling it around in a circle? Or are you just pushing my leg?
There is no pulling. No matter which way it's looked at it's all push.
Go through it all and see why.
 
Last edited:
So show me how you can prove there is only push.
The maths, the experiments, the proof?
no.

In seriousness though, has it been established why suck is such a thing the flat earther is against? What part of the global model does it disagree/agree with?
 
Last edited:
I think he just disagrees with everything in case 1 part of science disproves another part of his whopper.
It's crazy. Surely to be so forthright on every subject he must understand stuff to mathematical detail and not in the abstract in which he talks about the world we live/sail upon unhindered.
 
Last edited:
It's crazy. Surely to so forthright on every subject be must understand stuff to mathematical detail and not in the abstract in which he talks about the world we live/sail upon unhindered.
I don't think he's put forward a single proof or experiment in the whole thread but demands them from everyone else.
And he definitely said he had done superfluid experiments, evidence of his words posted back to him but he keeps deflecting away from that one.
 
I don't think he's put forward a single proof or experiment in the whole thread but demands them from everyone else.
And he definitely said he had done superfluid experiments, evidence of his words posted back to him but he keeps deflecting away from that one.
He doesn't really demand proof. He demands something that has never been uttered by human tongue previously. He wants someone to invent something totally new for him. Anything that has been uttered in human history can't be considered as it's from a second source and therefore authority driven. If people actually do some experiments/workings out themselves, as they have on this thread, it's simply ignored or asked for again without consideration.

Imagine being a person who is not scientifically minded at all telling people who are and who work in industry he knows better than them about their field of expertise. It's insulting and embarrassing.
 
Back
Top