Silly Point
Striker
T20 in the Caribbean or a pointless made up format in England as autumn starts to bite. Hmm tricky oneYou must be logged on to see media items
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
T20 in the Caribbean or a pointless made up format in England as autumn starts to bite. Hmm tricky oneYou must be logged on to see media items
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You must be logged on to see media items
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You must be logged on to see external links
![]()
![]()
players not interested....... viewers not interested.......
You must be logged on to see external links
if only they were half as interested as you.
I know, right? Cutting the number of teams from 18 to 8 during the summer holidays, taking cricket away from half the country?? Absolutely mental!!I am not really sure how the general public watching less cricket is a good thing?? but hey ho some obviously think it is!!
Yes, I wonder how the country aren’t interested in a thing the vast majority of them have no involvement in.I am not really sure how the general public watching less cricket is a good thing?? but hey ho some obviously think it is!!
I would say the county championship games this season more than any other season have been in general a terrible watch, Durham matches in particular, the amount of drawn matches with no result even close has been very high and very bad for the game imo.I know, right? Cutting the number of teams from 18 to 8 during the summer holidays, taking cricket away from half the country?? Absolutely mental!!
Problem is trying to attract new audiences to cricket is always going to be a difficult with all other attractions these days.Yes, I wonder how the country aren’t interested in a thing the vast majority of them have no involvement in.
Is it not obvious? Test cricket and domestic T20 cricket has very healthy and increasing viewing figures whilst the Hundreds are falling despite cheaper entry prices, greater promotion and fta coverage. The good thing is to give the public the product they enjoy.I am not really sure how the general public watching less cricket is a good thing?? but hey ho some obviously think it is!!
That wasn’t what I asked, so not sure why you replying ‘is it not obvious’Is it not obvious? Test cricket and domestic T20 cricket has very healthy and increasing viewing figures whilst the Hundreds are falling despite cheaper entry prices, greater promotion and fta coverage. The good thing is to give the public the product they enjoy.
So sorry,I thought you'd be able to see the connection. If you have less people watching a particular product which leads to continued losses then you dispense with the loss maker and prioritise the profitable product.That wasn’t what I asked, so not sure why you replying ‘is it not obvious’
I never asked the question why?
I said not really sure how the general public watching less cricket is a good thing?
However in answer to your question whatever gets more people especially new people watching cricket in the school holidays I am up for.
As don’t think first class 4 day cricket in the school holidays will achieve that.
If T20 would more than the hundred all for it.
Well that’s fine but 4 day cricket should not be played in the school holidays imo.So sorry,I thought you'd be able to see the connection. If you have less people watching a particular product which leads to continued losses then you dispense with the loss maker and prioritise the profitable product.
Obviously it's a good thing to attract new followers to a sport but there's little evidence that the Hundred is doing this. There's a limit to how much you can subsidise a new product when it's haemorrhaging money.
T20 has being attracted more people to the game continuosly. 4 day cricket won't attract more people to the game but it's the breeding ground for test cricket which, in England, is by far the biggest money earner of any form of cricket.
You're fully entitled to your believes but until you can back them with some concrete evidence there's little credibility to them.Well that’s fine but 4 day cricket should not be played in the school holidays imo.
There needs to be a full window in the school holidays to have a competition that does attract new people to the game.
Preferably T20 over The hundred as we all agree.
But if unfortunately it is The Hundred over T20 it’s not a good thing less people watching.
Because it’s not a good thing less people watching cricket in this country.
My belief is simple the cricket authorities should be doing all it can to get more involved in cricket for the longevity of the game.You're fully entitled to your believes but until you can back them with some concrete evidence there's little credibility to them.
Of course I am not suggesting it replaces test cricket, however I am suggesting both have designated windows throughout our summer.England can't replicate the IPL. There's neither the finance nor the fan base.
Are you seriously advocating that you run a short format replacing test matches which subsides the rest of cricket? There's absolutely no evidence that any short format will be successful in the summer holidays. It would be competing with football for the majority of the period.
The vast majority of T20 was played in summer evening and weekends prior to school vacation.
Yes, they've had such a competition for the last 20 years. Glad you've recognised the point.One short format competition designated window of 4/5 weeks with all top players available leaving rest of the summer for tests.