• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

NUFC/Sportswashing - Summer 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good to see some Newcastle fans showing other Newcastle fans up :lol:. Oh and the @nufck9e5 account was created in October 2021 hmm wonder what else happened then.

You must be logged on to see media items
Reading through his time line the bellend should have his kids taken off him. Begging and saying he wants to end his life because he is so skint and has no job yet finds at the very minimum £65 for a saudi strip?
 

Is there a coordinator of what aboutry for the loons. Have you noticed the monthly shift in game play. At first they were on the front foot, even attacking khashoggi’s fiancé and what about Disney. Then for a short period they even said the bombs being dropped on Yemen were from Sunderland.

There were a few other versions of the whataboutry until they settled on, “your argument is invalid because you never tweeted about human right before 2021”. This seemed to be the stock deflection tactic for a good few weeks. That is until this weeks deflection, that is very much on the defence. I’ve read “we are just defending our right to support our club”, a few times this week.

None of them getting the irony of any deflection whatsoever is a tiny little victory for sports washing. The change from being on the front foot to the defensive nature of their shite is interesting.

It would be absolutely delightful if some well known fans and journalists are on the payroll in return for positivity. It is not so far fetched.......but what does M&B get out of it on here. Is he the only apologist left?
 
Is there a coordinator of what aboutry for the loons. Have you noticed the monthly shift in game play. At first they were on the front foot, even attacking khashoggi’s fiancé and what about Disney. Then for a short period they even said the bombs being dropped on Yemen were from Sunderland.

There were a few other versions of the whataboutry until they settled on, “your argument is invalid because you never tweeted about human right before 2021”. This seemed to be the stock deflection tactic for a good few weeks. That is until this weeks deflection, that is very much on the defence. I’ve read “we are just defending our right to support our club”, a few times this week.

None of them getting the irony of any deflection whatsoever is a tiny little victory for sports washing. The change from being on the front foot to the defensive nature of their shite is interesting.
I am sure there was a statement of defence tweet put out for all Newcastle fans. Telling them what to say when someone criticises the Saudis.From one of the supporters groups
 
The crazy thing is the Prem League shamelessly came to same conclusion. As if the involvement of the Head of State was irrelevant to the investment vehicle.
Pressure from the government and maybe a few backhanders who knows. Shameful how it was allowed to happen when everyone knows the truth.
 
What an absolute scum bag that last one is. And if Mick Martin is reading - are you telling me if it was your daughter you would consider the NUFC fan base powerless in this?
His daughter is living with his ex wife and a Sunderland fan. It’s why he hates us so much
 
Reading through his time line the bellend should have his kids taken off him. Begging and saying he wants to end his life because he is so skint and has no job yet finds at the very minimum £65 for a saudi strip?
Browsed further down to takeover. According to all the lost magpies it was because of Ashley going? If they ever sang this they truly have sold their souls:

You must be logged on to see media items

Do feel sorry for him though. That is quite a moral dilemma - vaccine and work or no vaccine and starve. Not judging but the kid is close to illiterate so how has he arrived at that decision.

You must be logged on to see media items
 
The crazy thing is the Prem League shamelessly came to same conclusion. As if the involvement of the Head of State was irrelevant to the investment vehicle.
PL is as corrupt as the Tories that allowed this. They are all mired in💰💰💰💰💰 💰
Surely this is Exile?
Haway man that just plays out their belief that every single piece of negativity is Sunderland based 😂
 
Last edited:
Haha could be but Newcastle fans on twitter are fcked up so wouldn’t put it past them.

I don't think it is. He wouldn't use a derogatory term such as spastics.

It will be yet another loon - further down it is suggested it is
PL is as corrupt as the Tories that allowed this. They are all mired in💰💰💰💰💰 💰

Haway man that just plays out their belief that every single piece of negativity is Sunderland based 😂

It's me - I am just salty!

I am not saying Clarke, Simms and Ballard are better than mag players, as they are league above, but it is not like they are signing top players at all and at least I had heard of these three. Levels wise I liken Targett, Burn and Wood to Mick McCarthy type signings. I must admit I had not heard of this Watford kid as not watched much Prem football recently and whilst he may be one for the future he is hardly prolific.

His Prem stats: (goals 3: assists: 1)

Squad: 29, Starting eleven: 15, Substituted in: 13, On the bench: 1, Suspended: 0, Injured: 0

His Champ stats (goals 9: assists: 3)

Squad: 40, Starting eleven: 31, Substituted in: 7, On the bench: 2, Suspended: 1, Injured: 0
Squad: 9, Starting eleven: 0, Substituted in: 3, On the bench: 6, Suspended: 0, Injured: 0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Their big target Joao Pedro was dating a 15 year old when he was 18 year old, there’s a word for that in this country? ….
 
I've made no complaints to the mods. I bet there's a few against me though.

And as if by magic, I've received two points for inappropriate behavior apparently. Only it doesn't link to the post in question or mention what was inappropriate about it, and it's from an anonymous moderator account so I can't ask directly. Odd.

Any of the mods reading this mind pointing out what I said that was inappropriate? I'd like to learn from it and not repeat the mistake. Cheers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top