NUFC and other Sportswashing Spring 2022

[Wilsonian]

The absolute moron just has to be on a wind up...right?

Almost certainly not.

He's suffering from "I don't care what anyone says" syndrome.

A terrible disease which affllicts millions.

 

[Rogue Badger]

You must be logged on to see media items

I thought the Irish flag meant it must be a parody. I expected his pinned tweet to be a ballad about an absentee landlord selling golf umbrellas and giant mugs.

To be blessed with such little self awareness and not to be in Johnson's cabinet must be a massive kick in the bollocks.

 

[Poacher]

This is exactly why no amount of protesting will change anything. These bloody Saudis are here to stay

You just want us to shut up and stop highlighting this, this is the tone of all your posts. You are not fooling anyone

 

[PaddySAFC97]

@Mackemmichael is a blatant mag. It’s such a giveaway that the account was created on the same day as the takeover.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Let's call a spade a spade mate. You are claiming subjective morality just because you believe us, as Sunderland fans are suddenly becoming advocates of human rights and criticising Saudi Arabia merely because they own Newcastle? Lets be honest now.

Not at all. It covers all people, not just one group.
The fact the rivalry is there when we talk on this forum only heightens what I'm saying. It isn't specific to you.

Of course, if has brought in right into focus but ask yourself would you be referring to it as subjective morality if it was any other club than your own?

Yes because it covers all people in all countries, not just football fans.

These are bairns being killed, human lives being extinguished on large scale, this isn't a game mate.

I never believed it was anything other than barbaric which covers many many countries who do similar stuff and call it the consequence of war.
Then you get people who back that act and then reel back in horror at another when it's basically all the same thing.
Subjective morality covers it all with people. It's just a simple case of when it rears its head, kind of thing.

Knowing that other humans shouldn't be killed in such numbers is as base-level morals as it is possible to possess as a functioning human being.

No innocent human being should be killed or injured by deliberate acts but it happens all over the known populations of countries in many ways.
We are basically, pack animals and will believe we are morally right to do such things when the time comes, as we have in wars. Like I said, subjective morality and that's on the bigger issue of war.
the rest comes down to consumerism and what's acceptable and what's not when the time and a position suits.

Subjective morality we can't hide away from.

Take a look at the thread when "House of Saud" was broadcast a few years back. There was a load of criticism and disgust, including from myself.

There's a load of criticism at all times by many different groups for many many different things with many objections to different states on what their humanitarian goings-on are but we forget our own because we're made to believe we're a country of basic morals and innocence.

 

[BigPete]

@Mackemmichael is a blatant mag. It’s such a giveaway that the account was created on the same day as the takeover.

Yet mods do fuck all about it

 

[Nukehasslefan]

What the fuck is subjective when considering the morality of executing 81 people, including a child, for “deviant beliefs” ? Are you really that brainwashed ?

Aren't we all brainwashed?

On the moral high ground. Something you ***** know fuckall about.

It's something we all know about. It's just a case of when it's used and to what extent in any argument.

Sportswashed

Nope. Just a Newcastle United fan.

 

[Carley Hill wanderer]

Sir John Hall saying there's a black mark over all of Chelsea's achievements now and that their success is tainted. The irony and lack of self awareness is staggering.

Yes, then brushed over the double standards by mumbling about the takeover being approved by the government so all is ok

 

[Binxy]

Aren't we all brainwashed?

It's something we all know about. It's just a case of when it's used and to what extent in any argument.

Nope. Just a Newcastle United fan.

Answer me one question.

Ashley or MBS, who would you rather have as owner?

No essay needed just a one word answer.

 

[Mr Redknapp]

"I understand questions have to be asked, I have no problem with that. But my specialist subject is football. As soon as I deviate from that into an area I don’t feel qualified to have an opinion I get into dangerous ground. I'm best sticking to a preparing a team for Everton."

Wow! Breathtaking honesty there from Howe. You can see why doesn't want to stick his neck out.

It's not a dangerous opinion to be against murder

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Answer me one question.

Ashley or MBS, who would you rather have as owner?

No essay needed just a one word answer.

A Steve Gibson.

 

[Mr Redknapp]

Are these real, actual adults living the the real world?!?!

Because mean Mr Ashley never put his hand in his pocket, they deserve a murderer?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Because mean Mr Ashley never put his hand in his pocket, they deserve a murderer?

He actually did but not to the extent that some fans wanted.
Basically, he was never going to keep up with the rich clubs who were bankrolled, just as we are going to be, which I believe is wrong.

 

[Exile 1968]

You must be logged on to see media items

 

[Squat]

Subjective morality will always be a thing.

so will false equivalence

 

[Junior Birdman]

Eddie Howe needs to understand he's going to be asked 'difficult' none football related questions. That what happens when you accept a job where your wages are paid by owners with blood on their hands.

 

[Skylon]

Not at all. It covers all people, not just one group.
The fact the rivalry is there when we talk on this forum only heightens what I'm saying. It isn't specific to you.


Yes because it covers all people in all countries, not just football fans.

I never believed it was anything other than barbaric which covers many many countries who do similar stuff and call it the consequence of war.
Then you get people who back that act and then reel back in horror at another when it's basically all the same thing.
Subjective morality covers it all with people. It's just a simple case of when it rears its head, kind of thing.


No innocent human being should be killed or injured by deliberate acts but it happens all over the known populations of countries in many ways.
We are basically, pack animals and will believe we are morally right to do such things when the time comes, as we have in wars. Like I said, subjective morality and that's on the bigger issue of war.
the rest comes down to consumerism and what's acceptable and what's not when the time and a position suits.

Subjective morality we can't hide away from.

There's a load of criticism at all times by many different groups for many many different things with many objections to different states on what their humanitarian goings-on are but we forget our own because we're made to believe we're a country of basic morals and innocence.

What about your own morals?Are they not questionable?You said you condoned your owner having an 11 year old wife.You are definitely, a dodgepot

 

[Nukehasslefan]

so will false equivalence

Absolutely and that applies to all.

What about your own morals?Are they not questionable?

Massively, just like yours would be.

You said you condoned your owner having an 11 year old wife.

No, I didn't. You making that up and offering it as your truth or the pretence to others that I said this, is your issue and certainly not mine.

You are definitely, a dodgepot

You're entitled to think that as far as I'm concerned.

 

[Bear Heed]

Eddie Howe needs to understand he's going to be asked 'difficult' none football related questions. That what happens when you accept a job where your wages are paid by owners with blood on their hands.

He could've easily chosen a different club.

He knows the owners routinely murder, torture and mutilate people as part of their 'justice' system.

Surely he's had questions from his own friends and family, or is money so important that none of them care?

 

[Skylon]

Absolutely and that applies to all.

Massively, just like yours would be.

No, I didn't. You making that up and offering it as your truth or the pretence to others that I said this, is your issue and certainly not mine.

You're entitled to think that as far as I'm concerned.

You said its wrong ,because the morals of normal people around you think it's wrong.Thats not you personally thinking it's wrong.Therefore,you condone it.Dodgepot.