Put a flat earthier into space



Not by pulling it's not. It's by pushing against the atmosphere.


I don't care what you do.
Air cannot ever be pulled out of anything.
It's pushed out by compressing the external atmosphere to allow the internal pressure to expand into that lower pressure created by that pump forcing back that external atmosphere.

No such thing as sucking anything out.

Yes there is and i can prove so can you prove you argument then?
 
The small chamber is simply a chamber that can hold back pressure externally and ve evacuated of pressure internally via a strong enough pump to allow the expansion of atmosphere within it.

Nothing is sucked out of the container. There's no such thing as such in terms of what is happening with matter.
We attach that word to give us a meaning for what we see/perceive, not for a reality.
So then how are the items falling if there is no pressure internally? Can you explain that?
 
My argument is easily proved by those who want to think on it after doing the simple experiments.
I'd like to see how you can prove otherwise.

There is pressure internally. It's just lower pressure.
how can the whole of the scientific community never stumbled upon this reality before?

Why won't you share the new knowledge?

Science is about collaboration after all and we all know science and truth seeking is close to your heart
 
Light has no speed.
There's nothing to show it has any speed.
The energy required to make light as a pressure wave and frequency. It can be accepted as having a speed to target by sheer timing.
Light in itself is nothing more than reflection as is, not as was.

We're offered a 186,000 miles per second light speed.
The Earth is told to us to be just over 24,000 miles in circumference.
We're told that light will take approximately 1 second go around the Earth 8 times.

Now you can go ahead and believe this.
You can also go ahead and believe you see the sun light as it was 8 minutes ago.
You can also believe you see the light from any star you want, from however many hundreds, thousands, millions or so, years ago and that star may not exist but you'd never find out because your life span is at best give or take 100 years.

The list of silliness that's offered to us is off the scale and it seems people just want to believe because the fantasy offers something of mystery.
I agree it does and I have no qualms about people wanting to believe all that.
But to argue for it as a truth requires proof. To simply argue for it as a hmmmm or a maybe...etc, requires nothing more than offerings that also offer alternates.

This is where we're at whether you want to accept that or not.

By all means offer whatever expertise you can muster but I'll only bow to it when you offer proof for what you're arguing for against what my alternates are.
Personal incredulity strikes yet again.
 

Back
Top