So you are saying 2 separate mistakes were made and her body was missed yet if you look at the photo she left a bloody trail where she dragged herself around the bed is it really credible that experienced officers would not follow the trail of blood to find the body.
From what I understand the crime scene was used as an opportunity to train firearms officers as evidenced by the photo of the rifle being propped by a window so someone moved it. Also the photo showing a different hand placement of Sheila on the gun indicating that the crime scene was reconstructed which it would have to be when the rifle was removed and put by the window.
I agree with you there is a lot that should be made public because police deny the training opportunity, as they have many other things including that the gun was moved yet there is a photo showing it had. Many people seem certain of guilt or innocence, I was not there so could not say that I know who carried out the killings, why or how. unlike many commentators who seem very certain.
What I do know is the investigation was botched, many things have been covered up by the police at the time of the trial and the conviction is questionable, without even calling in to question the possible financial incentives a guilty verdict would bring to some of the witnesses, which the jury did not know about even though they tried to inquire at the time of Robert who said he had no incentive, but his wife and children got a lot of money and even Jeremy did not know that he would inherit half of the land Robert farmed which could have left Robert in financial ruin.
From what I understand the crime scene was used as an opportunity to train firearms officers as evidenced by the photo of the rifle being propped by a window so someone moved it. Also the photo showing a different hand placement of Sheila on the gun indicating that the crime scene was reconstructed which it would have to be when the rifle was removed and put by the window.
I agree with you there is a lot that should be made public because police deny the training opportunity, as they have many other things including that the gun was moved yet there is a photo showing it had. Many people seem certain of guilt or innocence, I was not there so could not say that I know who carried out the killings, why or how. unlike many commentators who seem very certain.
What I do know is the investigation was botched, many things have been covered up by the police at the time of the trial and the conviction is questionable, without even calling in to question the possible financial incentives a guilty verdict would bring to some of the witnesses, which the jury did not know about even though they tried to inquire at the time of Robert who said he had no incentive, but his wife and children got a lot of money and even Jeremy did not know that he would inherit half of the land Robert farmed which could have left Robert in financial ruin.