Solider F

Status
Not open for further replies.


Market Where? said:
Actually he initially “forgot” shooting at the barricade but then remembered when they dug his bullet out of the dead guy at the barricade.
Click to expand...
Like I said previously some of his statements won’t be allowed in court as they weren’t carried out under official caution. This is the reason it’s not clear cut. It’s like taking things what people say on here and presenting them to a court of law as fact.
 
the boot said:
Like I said previously some of his statements won’t be allowed in court as they weren’t carried out under official caution. This is the reason it’s not clear cut. It’s like taking things what people say on here and presenting them to a court of law as fact.
Click to expand...
I’m going to go with the finding of the biggest ever British enquiry lasting 12 years. Interviewing 900 eyewitnesses and offering all freedom from prosecution to everyone telling he truth - and say that soldier f is a wanker, the ira utilized the situation to make millions in the following decades and nobody gave one shiny shite about any innocent people who were injured.
 
FootballFan said:
They were, you have obviously not read the eye witness testimony.
Click to expand...
None of the witnesses can speak of his mental state, "in cold blood" would be killing without feeling. Like the use of "AWOL" yesterday you are using a turn of phrase either incorrectly or without merit.

You think he's murderous scum, we get it. Referring to the same thing multiple times doesn't really improve your position.

At least @CatRyan can give multiple reasons for hating everyone in the country she was born and raised in. ;)
 
Some Random Guy said:
None of the witnesses can speak of his mental state, "in cold blood" would be killing without feeling. Like the use of "AWOL" yesterday you are using a turn of phrase either incorrectly or without merit.

You think he's murderous scum, we get it. Referring to the same thing multiple times doesn't really improve your position.

At least @CatRyan can give multiple reasons for hating everyone in the country she was born and raised in. ;)
Click to expand...

If a lad comes out waiving a white handkerchief to help an injured/dying man and the accused gets down on one knee and puts a bullet through his head, then I'd call that cold blooded.

Dont see how you can argue otherwise tbf.
 
the boot said:
Like I said previously some of his statements won’t be allowed in court as they weren’t carried out under official caution. This is the reason it’s not clear cut. It’s like taking things what people say on here and presenting them to a court of law as fact.
Click to expand...

Not really. He shot someone in the back. A disabled adult who was afraid.
 
FootballFan said:
If a lad comes out waiving a white handkerchief to help an injured/dying man and the accused gets down on one knee and puts a bullet through his head, then I'd call that cold blooded.

Dont see how you can argue otherwise tbf.
Click to expand...
On the other side his CO ordered him forward into a hostile situation. He was a 19 yo going into a republican terrorist controlled no go area. An area where the ira did try to shoot said 19 yo and his friends
 
Market Where? said:
I’m going to go with the finding of the biggest ever British enquiry lasting 12 years. Interviewing 900 eyewitnesses and offering all freedom from prosecution to everyone telling he truth - and say that soldier f is a wanker, the ira utilized the situation to make millions in the following decades and nobody gave one shiny shite about any innocent people who were injured.
Click to expand...
The one that could only find enough evidence from 900 people to charge 1 out of 18 arrested? Well done sir.
He wasn’t under oath or caution when he told lies. I would imagine it was a debrief, once he knew that ballistics was being carried out he told the truth. Which was good enough for the enquiry. The Irish have pushed for this and Dave has the full wieght of the government behind him. He had not been hung out to dry.
 
Market Where? said:
On the other side his CO ordered him forward into a hostile situation. He was a 19 yo going into a republican terrorist controlled no go area. An area where the ira did try to shoot said 19 yo and his friends
Click to expand...

they were shooting unarmed peaceful demonstrators, not much hostile about that.

Simple case of cold blooded murder by a scumbag.
 
Good Bloke Fairly said:
Not really. He shot someone in the back. A disabled adult who was afraid.
Click to expand...
I can understand where people are coming from but going on past cases like lee clegg, he will walk. Imo.
I feel gutted for the people killed that day.
Tbh I don’t think it will make the courtroom. Crown that is. And I doubt it will be trail by jury.
 
the boot said:
I can understand where people are coming from but going on past cases like lee clegg, he will walk. Imo.
I feel gutted for the people killed that day.
Tbh I don’t think it will make the courtroom. Crown that is. And I doubt it will be trail by jury.
Click to expand...

He will be convicted IMO. Evidence is too overwhelming.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top