McCann Doc coming to Netflix

KarenDent said:
Didn't they claim all three children were using the one toothbrush ,two Doctors salaries and they rationed buying them a toothbrush each ?
Click to expand...
Nope, just that one of the twins could have used it too. So the sample could have been contaminated.
 


The Rat said:
My bad. I was probs talking Shite there


I agree in general but there are 2 posters talking like they know it as a fact and there’s concrete evidence. Don’t think they should get away with it. That’s different to people saying I have suspicions etc
Click to expand...

Thing is anyone offering up a theory is merely speculating. There are very few people who can say with any certainty what happened. I don't think any of them post on here.
 
Charlie Chimp said:
Why does it have to involve the friends mate? The kids were in crèche all day hardly ever mixing with the adults.

The bold bit is definitely still a possibility without involving the tapas group.

Why did Gerry not release their holiday pics to the cops before he went back home quite a few days after and grey scaled all the pics and blacked out quite a few. Is that actions of a man wanting to find his daughter. After all the police said they might see a stalker or summat on the photo's.

Why could they not provide the cop's with maddies dna sample. And had to go back know home to do so?
Click to expand...
Because members of the tapas group were checking on the kids during the evening.
I also find it beyond comprehension that having accidentally killed their daughter they would hatch an elaborate plan in which she disappears. That would require two very callous unfeeling people to treat their first born child as something to dispose of to save them embarrassment.
When they realised that sometning had happened to Maddie they'd have called for help regardless of them being doctors. The other theory that they killed her deliberately is so crazy that I'm surprised any sane person would consider it. Taking into account there is no evidnce that they did, or any motive for that matter. Plus if all this was to save them embarrassment and save their careers that went well for them. They are worldwide pariars and Mrs McCann packed her job as a GP in.
When evidence is shown that they were involved in what happened to their daughter I'll be at the front of the mob with a pitchfork and torch.. Until then they are innocent until proven guilty.
 
Last edited:
James said:
The reality is that there's almost literally no chance the parents could have killed the bairn without leaving some evidence. It's simply a mental idea.

However there's a very high chance she could have been abducted with zero evidence left, partly because of the circumstances (apartment unlocked, quiet side street etc) and partly because of the police incompetence, primarily in failing to secure a potential crime scene.

Just because there's no evidence of either does not make them as equally likely scenarios.
Click to expand...

The reverse I'm afraid.
 
Epping said:
So you keep saying. That post was a rational explanatiin.

You just choose the irrational explanation
Click to expand...

I have already explained countless times the most rational explanation is that already put forward by the Police, the one backed up by the evidence and the circumstances.
 
So all of those saying that the McCanns are innocent , can you explain how two highly trained sniffer dogs, with impeccable records of detection of both cadavers and blood , could react the way they did, but their evidence be ignored ??
 
radjee gadjee said:
So all of those saying that the McCanns are innocent , can you explain how two highly trained sniffer dogs, with impeccable records of detection of both cadavers and blood , could react the way they did, but their evidence be ignored ??
Click to expand...
they were faulty dogs marra - they proved that when they were working on a case ages ago and caused loads of work to dig up a site but they only found a coconut shell
 
radjee gadjee said:
So all of those saying that the McCanns are innocent , can you explain how two highly trained sniffer dogs, with impeccable records of detection of both cadavers and blood , could react the way they did, but their evidence be ignored ??
Click to expand...

Because a dog sniffing isn't evidence . There was no forensic evidence tonuse with it.

Read the facts
 

Back
Top