.... and it's killing them.
There must have been dozens of posters who vehemently insisted Short had a plan to take the club into administration and 'thereby line his pockets' or whatever. Even logical replies by people who understand finance, such as @Grumpy Old Man, were dismissed out of hand by people who 'knew better'.
I suspect this is the reason for so many of these 'I bet there are hidden clauses from Short and we'll be paying him for years' threads.
I've seen people claiming all kinds of dirty tricks regarding the takeover that will come back to haunt us, they simply refuse to believe we're debt free.
FFS lads, just accept he's done the decent thing and has given us the chance to draw a line on the past. Going back over Short, Bain, Byrne, etc etc etc is destructive and part of the problem. It's often said, on here, that there's a self destructive attitude from people who just happy clap and accept shit ..... so why don't those people look on the bright side, for once, and accept this opportunity to rebuild the club in the right way, just a thought.
Don't think there's many people looking at what he's done negatively, there's a lot of hatered for Short, especially over the past 2 year and rightly so but I think it's widely agreed that he's done the right thing by squashing the debt.
I also think that whilst it looks like a nice gesture, it was probably the only thing he could do to get out of the club, he was covering the costs of the club and no one would have been willing to take on the debt and the day to day funding of the club in league one so cutting his loses was really the only way for him to get out.
If he gets a bonus for us getting back in the top tier or not, I really don't give a fuck, he's gone and the dark cloud has been lifted but let's not blow smoke up Short's arse for playing the only move he really had left to make.