Adam Pearson Consortium

[Safc88]

You must be logged on to see external links

You must be logged on to see external links

You must be logged on to see external links

Oh well. Another time waster gone.

You have to laugh

 

[Abu Dhabi Red and White]

Those very words "Oh well. Another time waster gone."

Bascially that deals a no go.

So, Nixon admitted that he was wrong?

 

[Mackemed]

No, I mean the Venkys sacking of Allardyce was self inflicted and lead to their relegation. Allardyce leaving Sunderland was out of the clubs hands and on paper at least we employed a suitable replacement. Blackburn replaced Allardyce with Kean.

It's common knowledge Sam was about to leave. Even if regarded as bad luck, it was Short who was all over the club website when he appointed your worst nightmare Moyes, telling all and sundry he was "my number one target for the last five appointments" (which would of course include Allardyce). He could have sacked him in October, he didn't, he could have sacked him in January, he didn't, he could have sacked him in March, he didn't, he then could have sacked at the end of the season, but alas, he didn't. He actually spent his time desperately trying to convince Moyes to stay, but he failed in this endeavor too, and Moyes ending up leaving Short. Allardyce even said Short should sell. NEXT.

 

[Father Jack Hackett]

The European one sounds of most interest to me. Particularly if they have previous of resurrecting a club.

 

[The Rat]

The European one sounds of most interest to me. Particularly if they have previous of resurrecting a club.

where is that reported?

 

[one armed boxer]

Nixon is now mocking “other outlets” for catching up, remind me when he posted the story.

 

[WHD]

It's common knowledge Sam was about to leave.

No its not ffs. It's a rumour that has been repeated so many times it's became fact on here.

Even if regarded as bad luck, it was Short who was all over the club website when he appointed your worst nightmare Moyes, telling all and sundry he was "my number one target for the last five appointments" (which would of course include Allardyce)

I was initially pleased with the appointment. That soon changed though.

He could have sacked him in October, he didn't, he could have sacked him in January, he didn't, he could have sacked him in March, he didn't, he then could have sacked at the end of the season, but alas, he didn't.

Yes, he should have sacked him in October and we may have stood a chance. Unfortunately I think he had been taken in with all the "stability" bullshit, which plenty on here still spout - "we can't keep sacking managers" etc, etc

Allardyce even said Short should sell. NEXT.

And? Am I saying he shouldn't sell? No, I'm saying he is a different type of owner to the venkys.

 

[Dredd]

where is that reported?

On here.

 

[Safc88]

where is that reported?

Just someone on here

 

[Abu Dhabi Red and White]

Just someone on here

Tiger Feet - his name is Mud.

 

[The Rat]

Just someone on here

oh ffs

 

[Bears Beets]

This is getting more tedious by the day.

I’m starting believe Short will be here at the end of the Summer

 

[Speedy1976]

If they have withdrawn it would explain why it’s been so quiet regarding fresh info since I initially posted.

 

[Deleted member 20720]

I'm probably being pedantic. A change in shareholders is not an assignment of the debt. The debt is staying with the legal person to whom it was given. Were the assets and liabilities of Sunderland Limited being sold to another company, that would be an assignment. It's small, but important, distinction.

You’re confusing two completely separate issues. The transfer of shares being one, assignment of a loan agreement being another.

You can not transfer ownership of the organisation and not deal with or discharge agreements to which that organisation is party.

The loan will be governed by a loan agreement. As is standard with any corporate finance agreement, there will be a weighty section relating to assignment of the agreement to a third party. When you secure a loan you are subject to credit approval process, the same credit approval process will have to be satisfied by any prospective purchaser and will be at the discretion of the finance provider.

I'll gladly take someone slightly less wealthy but who is actively working hard to make it a success at all levels

But SBC might not. They want to know whomever is on the hook is good for that amount of debt.

 

[Abu Dhabi Red and White]

Nixon is now mocking “other outlets” for catching up, remind me when he posted the story.

If the Hull guy has opted out, surely it's Nixon who is catching up,?

 

[Mackem_blackcats_73]

Nixon gets fuck all right man.

 

[Father Jack Hackett]

where is that reported?

A lad on here

 

[Mackemed]

No its not ffs. It's a rumour that has been repeated so many times it's became fact on here.


I was initially pleased with the appointment. That soon changed though.


Yes, he should have sacked him in October and we may have stood a chance. Unfortunately I think he had been taken in with all the "stability" bullshit, which plenty on here still spout - "we can't keep sacking managers" etc, etc


And? Am I saying he shouldn't sell? No, I'm saying he is a different type of owner to the venkys.

@Fetch Fletch @Hongkongphooey @ProfessionalMackem @CissesUnderpants19 so it's the fans fault. Thanks for your insight.

P.S. if you're not opposed to him selling maybe he should stop slagging the fans off when he's in the process of selling it Scumbag Short Slagging the fans

 

[Tonton Zola Moukoko]

The European one sounds of most interest to me. Particularly if they have previous of resurrecting a club.

Which poster mentioned that?

 

[Beaverbrooke]

I'll gladly take someone slightly less wealthy but who is actively working hard to make it a success at all levels

I'd take someone considerably less wealthy if they were clever, and committed.
We've tried money & no brains, I'd prefer money and brains obviously, but brains & no money would be an inprovement on hideaway short and flenser bain.