mariner

Status
Not open for further replies.
  1. Friend
  2. Marriner
  3. Swarbrick
  4. Atkinson.
(In that order for their obvious bias)

Having watched them game after game after game, season after season, I don't believe they are just poor referees.
I believe (whether independently or as a conspiracy) they have an agenda against SAFC.
Cheats the lot of them.
 


LineMonkey said:
  1. Friend
  2. Marriner
  3. Swarbrick
  4. Atkinson.
(In that order for their obvious bias)

Having watched them game after game after game, season after season, I don't believe they are just poor referees.
I believe (whether independently or as a conspiracy) they have an agenda against SAFC.
Cheats the lot of them.
Click to expand...
I also believe we're getting less decisions against us now Allardyce is or manager as he has influence & will challenge dodgy decisions more than his predecessors, however, bias still shines through.

@redandwhiterob
@Voice of fair play
 
LineMonkey said:
Andre Marriner consistently doesn't give justifiable decisions in our favour though.... game after game.
He has an agenda against SAFC and is a cheat.


All of those decisions I called in real-time
Click to expand...

Take the profession up then and show these people how to go on. I'm sure you'd be loved by football supporters up and down the land

LineMonkey said:
I also believe we're getting less decisions against us now Allardyce is or manager as he has influence & will challenge dodgy decisions more than his predecessors, however, bias still shines through.

@redandwhiterob
@Voice of fair play
Click to expand...

How can you possibly say bias still shines through? Since the West Bromwich away game three months ago name me another game where a ref cost us points?
 
LineMonkey said:
Not necessarily.
As I've said, bias still apparent but less-so now Allardyce is willing to challenge
Click to expand...

How can you possibly say bias shines through. These refs are very good at being biased if they aren't costing us points are they?

LineMonkey said:
As I've said. Allardyce now taking them to task but their bias is still apparent
Click to expand...

How the fuck can you claim bias when they aren't costing us points? Please explain? No fudges, just a straight answer. Are you saying refs are deciding to be biased by making sure they don't cost us points?
 
Some people are certifiably mental. as if a random ref with no association to our club would be deliberately biased against us. He could have given both teams a penalty today and both would have been harsh. He failed to give possible fouls for both sides I thought but he had an OK game. Certainly didn't favour either team.
 
redandwhiterob said:
How can you possibly say bias shines through. These refs are very good at being biased if they aren't costing us points are they?

How the fuck can you claim bias when they aren't costing us points? Please explain? No fudges, just a straight answer. Are you saying refs are deciding to be biased by making sure they don't cost us points?
Click to expand...

The referees I've named consistently either give decisions against SAFC or don't give decisions in our favour.
I'm not saying they are colluding to do that ie a betting syndicate; what I am saying is that we need to work harder to gain points when these referees are in charge, than we would if other referees were officiating (playing against 12 men).
At the end of the day, if we score a fair goal, it's a goal, but the majority of 50/50 or even 60/40 decisions when these refs are in charge, go in favour of the opposition.
 
rentaghost said:
Some people are certifiably mental. as if a random ref with no association to our club would be deliberately biased against us. He could have given both teams a penalty today and both would have been harsh. He failed to give possible fouls for both sides I thought but he had an OK game. Certainly didn't favour either team.
Click to expand...

The conspiracy theory nuts hsve totally ignored the post by @Mackenx on the last page that showed when Marriner could have easily given a penalty to Man Utd but decided the Rooney handball was thd biggest stone waller in the history of football
 
rentaghost said:
Some people are certifiably mental. as if a random ref with no association to our club would be deliberately biased against us. He could have given both teams a penalty today and both would have been harsh. He failed to give possible fouls for both sides I thought but he had an OK game. Certainly didn't favour either team.
Click to expand...
No random referees. I've named them.
 
LineMonkey said:
The referees I've named consistently either give decisions against SAFC or don't give decisions in our favour.
I'm not saying they are colluding to do that ie a betting syndicate; what I am saying is that we need to work harder to gain points when these referees are in charge, than we would if other referees were officiating (playing against 12 men).
At the end of the day, if we score a fair goal, it's a goal, but the majority of 50/50 or even 60/40 decisions when these refs are in charge, go in favour of the opposition.
Click to expand...

:lol:
 
redandwhiterob said:
The conspiracy theory nuts hsve totally ignored the post by @Mackenx on the last page that showed when Marriner could have easily given a penalty to Man Utd but decided the Rooney handball was thd biggest stone waller in the history of football
Click to expand...
So 7x 50/50 decisions in favour of Man U / 1x 50/50 decision in favour of SAFC.
That's ok then.
 
LineMonkey said:
The referees I've named consistently either give decisions against SAFC or don't give decisions in our favour.
I'm not saying they are colluding to do that ie a betting syndicate; what I am saying is that we need to work harder to gain points when these referees are in charge, than we would if other referees were officiating (playing against 12 men).
At the end of the day, if we score a fair goal, it's a goal, but the majority of 50/50 or even 60/40 decisions when these refs are in charge, go in favour of the opposition.
Click to expand...

You've failed to answer the simple question again I have asked so ill ask again. If these refs are so biased why are we not dropping points when they have reffed out matches lately? They is a post on the last page thst shows Marriner could gave easily gave Man Utd a penalty. Given that you say Marriner is biased against us why do you think he never awarded the penalty?
 
redandwhiterob said:
You've failed to answer the simple question again I have asked so ill ask again. If these refs are so biased why are we not dropping points when they have reffed out matches lately? They is a post on the last page thst shows Marriner could gave easily gave Man Utd a penalty. Given that you say Marriner is biased against us why do you think he never awarded the penalty?
Click to expand...
I've answered. See post above
 
LineMonkey said:
So 7x 50/50 decisions in favour of Man U / 1x 50/50 decision in favour of SAFC.
That's ok then.
Click to expand...

Paranoid f***ing clap track. You fail to answer simple questions put to you. Why is that? Because you can't as there is no logic to your reasoning. Typical biased everybody is against us football fan but when it comes to the actually debating stuff your incapable as your logic is shown up for the f***ing nonsense it is

LineMonkey said:
I've answered. See post above
Click to expand...

That is not a answer ffs. It's just typical waffle
 
redandwhiterob said:
Paranoid f***ing clap track. You fail to answer simple questions put to you. Why is that? Because you can't as there is no logic to your reasoning. Typical biased everybody is against us football fan but when it comes to the actually debating stuff your incapable as your logic is shown up for the f***ing nonsense it is



That is not a answer ffs. It's just typical waffle
Click to expand...
You may be missing my point.
I'm not suggesting a betting syndicate etc. What I'm saying is anti-SAFC bias whether intentional or sub-conscious.
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = SAFC

redandwhiterob said:
Paranoid f***ing clap track. You fail to answer simple questions put to you. Why is that? Because you can't as there is no logic to your reasoning. Typical biased everybody is against us football fan but when it comes to the actually debating stuff your incapable as your logic is shown up for the f***ing nonsense it is
Click to expand...
Because Man U are a 'big club' / SAFC are scum (in their subconscious)
 
LineMonkey said:
You may be missing my point.
I'm not suggesting a betting syndicate etc. What I'm saying is anti-SAFC bias whether intentional or sub-conscious.
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = SAFC


Because Man U are a 'big club' / SAFC are scum
Click to expand...

Log off and go to bed before you dig yourself deeper into a hole
 
LineMonkey said:
You may be missing my point.
I'm not suggesting a betting syndicate etc. What I'm saying is anti-SAFC bias whether intentional or sub-conscious.
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = Man U
50/50 decision = SAFC


Because Man U are a 'big club' / SAFC are scum (in their subconscious)
Click to expand...


The evidence is there. Game after game, season after season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top