• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Yann M'vila - target or not?


Think it will tell us a lot. If he goes there and shows the class some of us think he will, it ends the argument a lot seem to have about him being too old, and the club being right not to sign him.

If he’s shit, then those of us who championed the deal to Sunderland acknowledge the club were correct.

Let’s see…
Stating the obvious one of your strong points?

Anyway, this is Sunderland. Of course he'll be class and lead them to promotion
 
Imagine being an Everton fan on a Sunderland board that no one actually likes.
No one likes 😳

Imagine thinking of that post 😳😳😳😳 What a wankspanner
Missed a trick here like, he’s exactly what we need
Hundreds of clubs around Europe been a free agent since July finally gets a club 8mth later

Is he what we need ? If he hadnt played here 7yr ago no one would actually give a shit
 
Last edited:
Think it will tell us a lot. If he goes there and shows the class some of us think he will, it ends the argument a lot seem to have about him being too old, and the club being right not to sign him.

If he’s shit, then those of us who championed the deal to Sunderland acknowledge the club were correct.

Let’s see…
Thanks Captain Obvious :lol:
 
No one likes 😳

Imagine thinking of that post 😳😳😳😳 What a wankspanner

Hundreds of clubs around Europe been a free agent since July finally gets a club 8mth later

Is he what we need ? If he hadnt played here 7yr ago no one would actually give a shit

Just being honest, you used to be alrite, but noticed recently you’ve became a total elevenereef.

Everton can do no wrong, and you’re so much bigger and better than everyone else, especially where players are concerned. You’d think your mob win the league every season given the way you go on.
 
Still baffling we didn't sign him. Free transfer, experienced defensive midfielder (a position we are lacking), still quality for championship level.
I would have given him 1 and a half year deal.
Only reason i could see not signing him is if he demanded huge wages but i don't think he would have being unemployed.
 
Still baffling we didn't sign him. Free transfer, experienced defensive midfielder (a position we are lacking), still quality for championship level.
I would have given him 1 and a half year deal.
Only reason i could see not signing him is if he demanded huge wages but i don't think he would have being unemployed.
A 1 and a half year deal for a free agent is a bit silly and makes no sense like. Short term deal to the end of the season and see where he's at. If he does the business give him another year.
 
Last edited:
if he goes to West Brom and we weren’t interested

It’s proof the model’s immediate aim isn’t to get promoted yet

We are developing the young players above all else right now - we will probably continue to do so until we’ve sold a few of them, and we have made enough money to then go out and “go for it” (I hope this is the long term plan)

Having Mvila now wouldn’t be in line with this. It would slow down the progression of our young players and thus slow down the progression of our club.
 
Last edited:
if he goes to West Brom and we weren’t interested

It’s proof the model’s immediate aim isn’t to get promoted yet

We are developing the young players above all else right now - we will probably continue to do so until we’ve sold a few of them, and we have made enough money to then go out and “go for it” (I hope this is the long term plan)

Having Mvila now wouldn’t be in line with this. It would slow down the progression of our young players and thus slow down the progression of our club.
It isn't proof at all.
 
if he goes to West Brom and we weren’t interested

It’s proof the model’s immediate aim isn’t to get promoted yet

We are developing the young players above all else right now - we will probably continue to do so until we’ve sold a few of them, and we have made enough money to then go out and “go for it” (I hope this is the long term plan)

Having Mvila now wouldn’t be in line with this. It would slow down the progression of our young players and thus slow down the progression of our club.
If we’d been genuinely interested he’d have been here early in January.

I agree the intention here is to identify young players with the potential to develop and add value.

Selling Gooch, Batth, and telling Pritchard last summer he was free to find another club. The failure (or maybe intentional refusal) to replace Evans and also bring in a more experienced forward against the wishes of the head coach indicates to me there are determined to stick with the process.

This is despite every ex manager, player, pundit you hear comment on it say to deny a coach those assets is seriously hampering the teams progress.

I’ve heard a few say that the real test of the model is when we sell Clarke for example for £20m+ and see how they reinvest the money.

I think the fee they received for Stewart is a warning that they might double down on this process and spend only a percentage of the fee on the next group of youngsters with potential.

If that is the case I think the club will stay in the championship for a long time.
 
if he goes to West Brom and we weren’t interested

It’s proof the model’s immediate aim isn’t to get promoted yet

We are developing the young players above all else right now - we will probably continue to do so until we’ve sold a few of them, and we have made enough money to then go out and “go for it” (I hope this is the long term plan)

Having Mvila now wouldn’t be in line with this. It would slow down the progression of our young players and thus slow down the progression of our club.
Developing the young players would be easier, from my perspective, if there was more experience in the dressing room rather than playing them constantly when they’re out of form or fitness and destroying their confidence.

Look at Brighton with lallana, welbeck, Milner etc.
 
Back
Top