DaveH
Striker
I think it is a case of change usually being gradual but this time it is fast. We were already having 'blended' meetings at work where we had someone at a remote site regularly and one person mostly working from home (she was heavily pregnant and struggling with a full day in, just before her full leave). It was working pretty well.I'm firmly on the left. People are going to lose their jobs through this shift and that is shit. I've got a lot of sympathy for those who can see their jobs going down the swanny, it's a brutal time. The answer however isn't forcing people back into the office just to prop up the economy. The world has changed, full time in the office is dead for most people, part time in is the future and we need to accept that rather than fight it.
The government has a role to help those people find new work through investing in new industries and creating jobs. There's a great opportunity in all of this mess for a greener, more localised economy. It's going to be a pretty rough ride for a lot of sectors in getting there though, that's the unfortunate reality. You'd like to think we as a country would look after these people until they can find new employment.
On the other side of things, we had suppliers come for either sales calls or just account catch ups, where they would have 3 hours drive, talk to us for just under an hour and 3 hours back. 1 hour to catch up on mails and that was their working day.
We had just signed up to Office365 and were preparing to hit the button to turn on Teams by mid-March. That better environment would have lead to people being able to work from home and attend meetings. My father-in-laws company had adapted too, and he was working 2 days from home.
With such gradual change, it doesn't get noticed. Perhaps the sandwich shop is not quiet so busy on a lunch time so when someone leaves they are not replaced. Perhaps the same company decides after a while to move from one at each end of a long street to a single store in the middle. It is all gradual and not noticed. This change could be a big bang change. I know my work is considering making every post have the option of 2 days at home, unless the job requires you to be onsite. If everyone does that, it is a 40% reduction in traffic and sales to local businesses.
But, like you said, it leads to other businesses. I said before about local cafes and pubs becoming meeting spots. If two people live near each other, why go to the office for a meeting? Also, the home office/garden building business is booming. IT equipment sales are up, as are office furniture. People are looking at extensions. The money will get spent, just spread out. Some businesses around workplaces will fall by the wayside, just a quick death rather than a drawn out one. It is what happens. Same as you don't see many blacksmiths and cobblers these days.