D
Dilligaf60
Guest
It’s a foul word. But, I save it for special (not in a good way, special) people x
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s a foul word. But, I save it for special (not in a good way, special) people x
I remember the days when this was a right-wing conspiracy theory that will never happen.
Less chance of catching and therefore spreading it if you’re vaccinated, less chance of being seriously ill also so win win all round really
Yep, and what about the people who’ve had no vaccine and no Covid yet?Even less chance of catching and spreading it if you've had it and developed a natural immunity.
And also he pharma gang are also involved with these fact checkers along with Facebook etc. When you join the dots it really does start to look like one big piss take going on, smoke screened by Covid.Jabs aside, you do realise Pfizer the company who were fined a record fine of $2.3bn for misinformation and bribing doctors are pushing for passports. With this comes an annual or possibly 5/6 monthly income of boosters. All ready set for 35 billion revenue this year. It’s all on google.
And while your there, google the main shareholders behind the vaccines, then Facebook, Twitter, Google and most US media outlets.
Don’t be surprised it’s the same people.
Look to the stats in Australia, Israel to see there’s data on both sides.
I’m not saying there’s no virus or that we’re all being chipped but whenever there is this much money being made there’s a level of corruption somewhere and this passport doesn’t sit right with me.
What happened to our medical information being private ?
What happens if the passport is carried over to the next illness which requires vaccines ? Flu jab ? and god knows what else. Once your providing ‘papers’ to do things it all becomes a bit North Korea.
Haway
They'll say that people can show a negative test result as an alternative I reckon.
I had my second dose of the vaccine in May and would encourage anyone who hasn't already had theirs to do so. The vaccines have been clearly shown to work at what truly matters: they are the reason that the thousands of daily cases recorded are now translating into so few hospitalisations and deaths. The risks of catching covid, even for a young and healthy person, are far greater than the risks of any of the vaccines. If you aren't jabbed, get jabbed!
That said, I am completely opposed to domestic vaccine passports being introduced, and I hope this doesn't clear the Commons.
Has there been any evidence yet to show how long the protection from the vaccine lasts? The last I heard, it may lose effectiveness after 6-12 months, much like the natural immunity I'd gain from catching covid would wear off over time. Will I be required to have regular boosters to stop my covid passport from expiring?
Should we also have passports to show that we're vaccinated against flu each winter (which I am)? I know it's considered heinous to compare the two viruses for some reason, but frankly I don't want either so is this something the government should genuinely think about in future? I hear we may be in for a difficult flu season.
At the very least, I would want a negative test to be a sufficient alternative to showing your vaccine status. If anything that seems safer, given it's shown to be possible to transmit covid even if you're fully vaccinated, whereas you can't transmit it if you are negative and therefore don't have it to transmit.
The trouble is now we’re all being played against one another, conflicting information about who can pass on the virus and who can’t. Different stats coming from different countries.And also he pharma gang are also involved with these fact checkers along with Facebook etc. When you join the dots it really does start to look like one big piss take going on, smoke screened by Covid.
This government is a f***ing shambles.
Imagine not even having a single academic qualification and thinking you know betterGot to love Sage mind, still as clueless as ever.
The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) said its modelling suggested hospitalisations could reach 2,000 to 7,000 per day next month.
The MO IMO these days is to drag things out to cause maximum stress and confusion and division. Brexit. This. Anything. The news has a purpose and it is not to tell you what the news is but to tell you want it wants you to think, and to stir feelings, and create situations. It is not co-incidence that media sounds like medea, the Greek sorceress of deception, and that govern ment, comes from Latin - to steer / rule the mind.Why be so ambiguous? Just do it or don't ffs. Typical Johnson trying to please everyone.
The MO IMO these days is to drag things out to cause maximum stress and confusion and division. Brexit. This. Anything. The news has a purpose and it is not to tell you what the news is but to tell you want it wants you to think, and to stir feelings, and create situations. It is not co-incidence that media sounds like medea, the Greek sorceress of deception, and that govern ment, comes from Latin - to steer / rule the mind.
Anyway, that is the reason for the ambiguity.