• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Sunderland Central Railway Station

Status
Not open for further replies.

So we agree Nexus are involved in improvements to the station and the Nexus are funded by the council?

And 7M for the last 'upgrade' we didn't get much for that. That dodgy light wall and ermmm...??? Your jollies to visit other train stations no doubt?

Bu Nexus fund improvements.
Just admit you’re wrong and stop digging
 
Just admit you’re wrong and stop digging
Which bit is wrong?

The council contribute to Nexus?
Nexus funded the last revamp of the station?

I see the council lovers have appeared, just like Vaux when it was never the councils fault that they didn't buy the site as the council can't do that type of thing, until they did exactly that year's later.

Who's funded the next station upgrade?
 
Which bit is wrong?

The council contribute to Nexus?
Nexus funded the last revamp of the station?

I see the council lovers have appeared, just like Vaux when it was never the councils fault that they didn't buy the site as the council can't do that type of thing, until they did exactly that year's later.

Who's funded the next station upgrade?



It would appear the majority of money is coming from central government transforming cities funding. There is some match funding but it doesn’t break down who is contributing the £4.7m.

Other are correct in saying that the buildings and track are owned by network rail but is managed by Northern Rail. Nexus are obviously a key stakeholder as they operate their trains from the station.
 
Which bit is wrong?

The council contribute to Nexus?
Nexus funded the last revamp of the station?

I see the council lovers have appeared, just like Vaux when it was never the councils fault that they didn't buy the site as the council can't do that type of thing, until they did exactly that year's later.

Who's funded the next station upgrade?
You have told us in no uncertain terms who you don't want. Would you be happy with a Tory council?
 
What a terrible impression it gives visitors both inside and externally coming to Sunderland.What a carbuncle.Sunderland deserves better.
There is a railway station over the water that could be used as the main gateway to the town. All the land is currently available on the sheepfolds side to create a main entrance. With bus and taxi drop offs, the lifts are already in place for disabled access at St Peters.
It would be a whole lot cheaper than pouring more money into the hole in the ground that is the current railway station.
Which bit is wrong?

The council contribute to Nexus?
Nexus funded the last revamp of the station?

I see the council lovers have appeared, just like Vaux when it was never the councils fault that they didn't buy the site as the council can't do that type of thing, until they did exactly that year's later.

Who's funded the next station upgrade?
I am not one who sticks up for the council. But at the time Swallow closed Vaux no one wanted the council to buy the site as they didnt want any more money going into Swallow.
That attitude changed when Tesco bought the site.
 
Last edited:
There is a railway station over the water that could be used as the main gateway to the town. All the land is currently available on the sheepfolds side to create a main entrance. With bus and taxi drop offs, the lifts are already in place for disabled access at St Peters.
It would be a whole lot cheaper than pouring more money into the hole in the ground that is the current railway station.

You can see from the image in that following link the amount of area there is available. Guess the only question is whether there is sufficient space to come off the track and then back on again.

 
What a terrible impression it gives visitors both inside and externally coming to Sunderland.What a carbuncle.Sunderland deserves better.
It does give a terrible impression and is awful. However, I'm sure that it is fairly obvious. However, as there is no magic wand, we'll have to get on with it until funds can improve it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top