HebburnMackem
Striker
>Actually every physicist on the planet knows that QM and Relativity are wrong at a fundamental level. They're not just "incomplete". QM will never be able to include gravity, relativity will never be able to describe things at a quantum level. Both models, whilst highly accurate and a huge accomplishment, are wrong. Problem is... we don't even know where to start in creating a new model.
Gustav Kirchhoff, Ludwig Boltzman, Heinrich Hertz, Schrödinger, Max Planck, Einstein and indeed Hawkins all worked with or had dealings with QM along with a large field of scientists today. So yeah, there's that.
Most electronics companies have to deal with the very real and physical effects of QM in their small scale products. For example Quantum Tunneling which is part of QM is a very much a real thing. So yeah, there's that too.
>Conservation of energy?
A common misconception. The conservation of energy is related to the time invariance of physical rules and laws. Ie, it works the same way in both directions of time.
Check out Noether's theorem for further information.
>Einstein-Rosen bridges are a theoretical consequence of the abstract maths in relativity. To create one would take a particle accelerator the size of the f***ing solar system.
Yes they are a theory, yet to be proven or disproven. But everything points to the likelihood of them existing far more than not. That's exactly why you'd not use a particle accelerator for that. One method uses a type of exotic matter that has negative mass which is far less "fringe" than I thought, apparently it's been produced in some form more than once. (I've not dug into the details yet)
https://phys.org/news/2017-04-physicists-negative-mass.html
By the way, that's observational evidence in field of QM, the very thing you say doesn't exist. There's a link to the paper at the bottom.
And another one by an independent source:
Lasers Used to Create Negative Mass Particles - ExtremeTech
>Upon reading the rest of your post I've realised that you have no formal education in physics and are just writing nonsense, no offence intended.
Actually I do and furthermore I think I've represented my case far better than you with the attempt to explain things and provide links to the subject matter. But I see you've stopped debating and are beginning with the insults, what a shame.
>I'm guessing you've read wiki pages on physics
I get my data from all sorts of sources as long as it has citations (or at least try). There's nothing inherently wrong with wiki pages any more than a paper page, it's the citations to white papers, studies and research that make the difference.
>and watched Michio Kaku documentaries on the scyfy channel but have never actually picked up a maths book and learned the basics.
I see, more unneeded insults.
>You need to forget everything you've learned and go back to the beginning marra. It's literally impossible to get a grasp of physics without learning how to use abstract maths.
Actually the best thing to do is just end this conversation. You seem to be happy disagreeing with some of the scientific greats throughout history regarding and an entire field of physics and related industries that uses it regarding QM and relativity.
Regardless of who's right or wrong, for some reason you've out of the blue needlessly resorted to being deliberately condescending and insulting. I don't know why you feel threatened enough to do that.
Yeah, prolly for me too.The highlight for me was the reimagined Enterprise. I think they did a really good job of updating it but keeping an original feel to it.
So yeah, it looks like Michael does indeed go back in time and her DNA was correct. They just confused which times were hers and which her mothers.
No plot hole last week then
Last edited: