SMB Tennis thread (note there is a specific Wimbledon 22 thread)



billybobmackem2312 said:
So having the most slams right now means they’re the greatest? In that case Margaret court would smash Serena :cool:
Click to expand...
Imagine using an example as a comparison of two players who played 40 years apart :lol: different generations, Novak and Federer are playing now. It’s very different.

Mate you said Federer is 6 years older and in the same post said that Novak would come out on top if they were both in their prime. Well we’ve just watched the longest and closest Wimbledon finals ever with Federer clearly not in his prime and turning 38 this year.
 
The greatest player of all time. He is an absolute freak. The f***ing bollocks on you to come back from match point down *40-15 against Roger Federer in a Grand Slam, not once but twice, is incredible.

The second best player in that match for 95% and he's managed to beat Federer. There is no player in history that could do that in a Wimbledon final.
 
MarcoG said:
The greatest player of all time. He is an absolute freak. The f***ing bollocks on you to come back from match point down *40-15 against Roger Federer in a Grand Slam, not once but twice, is incredible.

The second best player in that match for 95% and he's managed to beat Federer. There is no player in history that could do that in a Wimbledon final.
Click to expand...
Just had a better tie break strategy.
 
MarcoG said:
The greatest player of all time. He is an absolute freak. The f***ing bollocks on you to come back from match point down *40-15 against Roger Federer in a Grand Slam, not once but twice, is incredible.

The second best player in that match for 95% and he's managed to beat Federer. There is no player in history that could do that in a Wimbledon final.
Click to expand...
Can't argue with that
 
MarcoG said:
The greatest player of all time. He is an absolute freak. The f***ing bollocks on you to come back from match point down *40-15 against Roger Federer in a Grand Slam, not once but twice, is incredible.

The second best player in that match for 95% and he's managed to beat Federer. There is no player in history that could do that in a Wimbledon final.
Click to expand...
Whoaaa don’t come out with that mate the roger fanboys will be all over you

scotch said:
Can't argue with that
Click to expand...
@LondonMackem will :lol:
 
LondonMackem said:
Imagine using an example as a comparison of two players who played 40 years apart :lol: different generations, Novak and Federer are playing now. It’s very different.

Mate you said Federer is 6 years older and in the same post said that Novak would come out on top if they were both in their prime. Well we’ve just watched the longest and closest Wimbledon finals ever with Federer clearly not in his prime and turning 38 this year.
Click to expand...
Novak and federer are playing now yes, and Novak is smashing him.
 
billybobmackem2312 said:
Novak and federer are playing now yes, and Novak is smashing him.
Click to expand...
At 6 years his younger I’d expect him to. He’s the current No.1 and in his prime. He’s also a very good player. Took him 5 hours, a better tie break strategy, and a bit of luck, but he got it over the line. Fair play to him. Maybe one day he’ll become the best ever!

billybobmackem2312 said:
Better tie break strategy :lol: :lol: :lol:
Click to expand...
Did he win a set that didn’t go to tie break?

billybobmackem2312 said:
Nah mate I just think your Roger love in is cringey as fuck :lol:
Click to expand...
I see irony is lost on you :lol:
 
Last edited:

Back
Top