• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Nukehasslefan said:
No. It's looking at water and knowing it finds its own level. It does not find any level on a curve unless there is a curve on the floor of a container the water sits atop of.
Click to expand...

Wait what?

So you're saying that water can curve as long as the container is curved.
 
Nobby said:
Air is sucked into jet engines by the fans.
Click to expand...
No such thing as suck.
Air is compressed into fans due to a creation of low pressure within.
Nobby said:
There is no so called atmospheric barrier behind the engines and there is nothing pushing the aircraft from behind.
Click to expand...
It's a push on push from the in rushing air and burn from the front of the engine and into it to the massive thrust into the atmosphere behind it which creates a massive expansion which compresses that air behind which then crushes right back against that which provides the consistent moving barrier to that thrust.

Nobby said:
Watch the operations on an aircraft carrier deck to see the extreme precautions they take to avoid jest blast damage. They wouldn't need to do that if there was an atmospheric barrier.
Click to expand...
I've just explained that.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
None that would interest you.
Click to expand...

They would all interest me if they indicated that there was a carbon arc lamp in the middle of the north pole that created the illusion of a sun and moon and kept the planet heated.

I'm a scientist. If such an experiment exists that shows this amazing discovery, then of course it would interest me.
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
So it cannot be the reason why things fall to Earth.
Click to expand...
Course it can. Atmosphere is stacked and it is stacked with more dense mass at the bottom and much less at the top due to that stacking.
Any mass placed into that stack will be pushed back down by what it displaces of that atmosphere, unless that mass is less dense than the layered atmosphere it is placed into.
fyl2u said:
Wait what?

So you're saying that water can curve as long as the container is curved.
Click to expand...
Of course it can curve over a curved container bottom but it will be flat at the surface, which is what counts.
Your spinning globe cannot offer that.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
No such thing as suck.
Air is compressed into fans due to a creation of low pressure within.

It's a push on push from the in rushing air and burn from the front of the engine and into it to the massive thrust into the atmosphere behind it which creates a massive expansion which compresses that air behind which then crushes right back against that which provides the consistent moving barrier to that thrust.


I've just explained that.
Click to expand...
Gibberish, but you have to create a fiction to try and explain what the engine is pushing against else your theory of why rockets can fly in space falls apart.

The best bit is it doesn't take any science to expose your lie this time, you just have to watch how people work around jets to see how jet blast behaves
 
Nobby said:
Gibberish, but you have to create a fiction to try and explain what the engine is pushing against else your theory of why rockets can fly in space falls apart.

The best bit is it doesn't take any science to expose your lie this time, you just have to watch how people work around jets to see how jet blast behaves
Click to expand...
It's easy to see what really happens.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Of course it can curve over a curved container bottom but it will be flat at the surface, which is what counts.
Click to expand...

No it won't, it will curve at the surface. It's provable and testable with accurate measuring equipment capable of measuring the expected curve of an 8 inches per mile squared drop across the length of your container.

Nukehasslefan said:
Your spinning globe cannot offer that.
Click to expand...

It can and it does.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Course it can. Atmosphere is stacked and it is stacked with more dense mass at the bottom and much less at the top due to that stacking.
Click to expand...
We've been here before. Layers of differing density do not get to decide which way is up or down. Without gravity there is no up or down.
Nukehasslefan said:
Any mass placed into that stack will be pushed back down by what it displaces of that atmosphere, unless that mass is less dense than the layered atmosphere it is placed into.
Click to expand...
So a mass dense enough to displace atmosphere is then displaced by the very atmosphere it has just displaced.... righto.

Lets just pretend that the atmosphere within a sealed cell wouldn't equalise anyway and "Think up a nonsense and pass it off as factual and offer anything that looks to fit a fictional story and an observation." shall we?
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
We've been here before. Layers of differing density do not get to decide which way is up or down. Without gravity there is no up or down.
Click to expand...
Layers of atmosphere does gauge up or down.
Try it with liquids of differing densities and see where the densest lie and the less dense lie in the stack.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
So a mass dense enough to displace atmosphere is then displaced by the very atmosphere it has just displaced.... righto.
Click to expand...
Dense mass simply displaces atmosphere. That same dense mass is acted upon by that amount of displacement.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Just take a bit of time to think on that, without bias.
Click to expand...

I have, and it's still right.

Now you do the same.

If you have a container like, say, a bath that is 1 metre long, and you're testing to find out whether or not there's a curve of 8 inches per MILE SQUARED like everyone else is saying, how accurate would your measuring device have to be to prove without a shadow of a doubt that the 8 inches per mile squared curve does not exist?

Nukehasslefan said:
Flat and level is provable, not curvature on the surface of water in a container.
Click to expand...

With the right equipment you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt which is true: whether it is flat or whether it is curved to the extent someone might expect with an 8 inches per mile squared drop.
 
Kevj said:
A reply to my question.

How did we arrive at the criteria which constitutes a metric ton.

I’m repeating myself here. I’d love a straight answer.
Click to expand...
I don't know, shall I look it up or can you enlighten me as to what you believe is the case or maybe you find the answer you want?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top