Put a flat earthier into space

They don't realise how big the planet is, it's so big it takes 24 hours to rotate, exactly 15 degrees an hour, they even debunked themselves on their own documentary when they paid 20k for a gyroscope to see if there was any drift, they still didn't believe the evidence when it was staring them in the face.

Also remember the excitement with the lasers then the lights at the end. Hilarious
 


Nukehasslefan

Midfield
Have you never been on a plane? You can clearly see the curvature of the earth 😂. Gotta be on a wind up. Surely.
No you can't mate but if you think you can then that's your perception.
He obviously hasn't, otherwise he'd understand why a helicopter moves with the atmosphere and Earth in the same way that the plane is traveling at 600mph yet he can stand in the aisle then go for a piss in the toilets and come back if he pleases.

Flat earthers don't understand, frames of reference.
That's the wrong frame of reference when arguing this point.

Your plane is a sealed unit whereas the supposed global spinning Earth has to carry the atmosphere with it at over 1000 mph.
It's like saying a plane will carry the atmosphere with it; external to it as it flies.

And also if people use the plane as a supposed analogy then they can't then use the coriolis effect.
They can't have it both ways.
Watch it here on the surface

yawn!
The pendulum moves around the table, not the table moving under the pendulum as if the Earth was spinning.
The thing with this is, it's not even an argument as to what is what.
One can say it's the Earth moving and the other can say the pendulum, as in, me and anyone else who doesn't believe the Earth is a spinning oblate spheroid.
They are the absolute embodiment of Dunning Kruger.
That all depends on the circumstance. It could not be me, it could be you. It could be all of us.
Absolutely.
When they say we are travelling at 1000mph and don't feel it this is why, a simple experiment they can perform by driving on a motorway.
Same thing as earlier. Wrong frame of reference.
The Earth is said to be spinning in a vacuum of space.
The atmosphere on Earth is said to be spinning in exact unison with it.
And also we have clouds and winds going in all directions, even opposite the supposed spin and yet we are told to believe everything just gets dragged along.
 
Last edited:

Hend79

Goalkeeper
No you can't mate but if you think you can then that's your perception.

That's the wrong frame of reference when arguing this point.

Your plane is a sealed unit whereas the supposed global spinning Earth has to carry the atmosphere with it at over 1000 mph.
It's like saying a plane will carry the atmosphere with it; external to it as it flies.

And also if people use the plane as a supposed analogy then they can't then use the coriolis effect.
They can't have it both ways.

The pendulum moves around the table, not the table moving under the pendulum as if the Earth was spinning.
The thing with this is, it's not even an argument as to what is what.
One can say it's the Earth moving and the other can say the pendulum, as in, me and anyone else who doesn't believe the Earth is a spinning oblate spheroid.

That all depends on the circumstance. It could not be me, it could be you. It could be all of us.

Same thing as earlier. Wrong frame of reference.
The Earth is said to be spinning in a vacuum of space.
The atmosphere on Earth is said to be spinning in exact unison with it.
And also we have clouds and winds going in all directions, even opposite the supposed spin and yet we are told to believe everything just gets dragged along.

Absolute loon :lol: :lol: :lol:

Its an embarrassment that supposed educated people think like you in this day and age.
 

Nukehasslefan

Midfield
Conservation of momentum.
It's not a set of words of real meaning. It's a what if set of words.
Conservation of momentum does not exist as a reality.
Nobody has to”believe” science. It’s mathematically proven.
That depends on what is deemed as, science and what are deemed as, scientists.

Things that can be physically proven can be put down to science and of the scientists that prove that specific.
There's a lot of stuff that is not proven and a lot of stuff that begs questions.

This is where I'm at.
 
Last edited:

Hend79

Goalkeeper
It's not a set of words of real meaning. It's a what if set of words.
Conservation of momentum does not exist as a reality.

That depends on what is deemed as, science and what are deemed as, scientists.

Things that can be physically proven can be put down to science and of the scientists that prove that specific.
There's a lot of stuff that is not proven and a lot of stuff that begs questions.

This is where I'm at.
We all know where you are at. In a world of your own :lol:
 

Nukehasslefan

Midfield
They don't realise how big the planet is, it's so big it takes 24 hours to rotate, exactly 15 degrees an hour, they even debunked themselves on their own documentary when they paid 20k for a gyroscope to see if there was any drift, they still didn't believe the evidence when it was staring them in the face.
Taking 24 hours to supposedly rotate is neither here nor there.
What counts is us being on the deck and supposedly spinning at over 1000 mph.
And also the Earth supposedly spinning around a near 1 million mile diameter sun, as we're told....at 66,000 mph as they would have us believe.

They can't argue the Earth takes 24 hours to do one rotation and then argue the Earth bulges at the equator because it spins so fast.

Two massively contradictory stories.
Even though i think you’re on a git wind up on here..do you really believe the earth is flat..yes or no??
I'm on no wind up but I can't decide who wants to think it. That's up to whoever.

Also, like I've said many many times on here, I don't follow flat discs and turtles/elephants and what not holding it up.

I do follow that water seeks it's level and conforms to the container it is put in. Basically flat and level when calm and certainly not curved convexly.

I simply believe Earth to be a cell among many cells just like it.

Basically we are all inside of it, covered.
Absolute loon :lol: :lol: :lol:

Its an embarrassment that supposed educated people think like you in this day and age.
To you it maybe is.
You also have to ask yourself how you came to believe what you actually believe.

Who did you rely on for yout truth's?
The natural reaction to alternate thinking is to be called a lunatic and every other name bandied about, so I get you.
We all know where you are at. In a world of your own :lol:
In a world that few accept, I agree.
Most people believe they're on a spinning globe in a space vacuum, warmed by a big near 1 million mile diameter sun that is 93 million miles away and also believe that we just manage to go around it in an elliptical orbit, somehow whilst being tilted on a 23 degree angle.

That's definitely not the world I live in so I have to absolutely agree with your point.
 
Last edited:

Hend79

Goalkeeper
Taking 24 hours to supposedly rotate is neither here nor there.
What counts is us being on the deck and supposedly spinning at over 1000 mph.
And also the Earth supposedly spinning around a near 1 million mile diameter sun, as we're told....at 66,000 mph as they would have us believe.

They can't argue the Earth takes 24 hours to do one rotation and then argue the Earth bulges at the equator because it spins so fast.

Two massively contradictory stories.

I'm on no wind up but I can't decide who wants to think it. That's up to whoever.

Also, like I've said many many times on here, I don't follow flat discs and turtles/elephants and what not holding it up.

I do follow that water seeks it's level and conforms to the container it is put in. Basically flat and level when calm and certainly not curved convexly.

I simply believe Earth to be a cell among many cells just like it.

Basically we are all inside of it, covered.

To you it maybe is.
You also have to ask yourself how you came to believe what you actually believe.

Who did you rely on for yout truth's?
The natural reaction to alternate thinking is to be called a lunatic and every other name bandied about, so I get you.
I believe the science behind it and the scientists, astronomers, astronauts etc who have actually studied and been involved with the study of space and space travel.

I dont believe loons on the internet who havent done any of the above and therefore have opinions which are complete garbage.
 

DPTT

Winger
Taking 24 hours to supposedly rotate is neither here nor there.
What counts is us being on the deck and supposedly spinning at over 1000 mph.
And also the Earth supposedly spinning around a near 1 million mile diameter sun, as we're told....at 66,000 mph as they would have us believe.

They can't argue the Earth takes 24 hours to do one rotation and then argue the Earth bulges at the equator because it spins so fast.

Two massively contradictory stories.

I'm on no wind up but I can't decide who wants to think it. That's up to whoever.

Also, like I've said many many times on here, I don't follow flat discs and turtles/elephants and what not holding it up.

I do follow that water seeks it's level and conforms to the container it is put in. Basically flat and level when calm and certainly not curved convexly.

I simply believe Earth to be a cell among many cells just like it.

Basically we are all inside of it, covered.

To you it maybe is.
You also have to ask yourself how you came to believe what you actually believe.

Who did you rely on for yout truth's?
The natural reaction to alternate thinking is to be called a lunatic and every other name bandied about, so I get you.

In a world that few accept, I agree.
Most people believe they're on a spinning globe in a space vacuum, warmed by a big near 1 million mile diameter sun that is 93 million miles away and also believe that we just manage to go around it in an elliptical orbit, somehow whilst being tilted on a 23 degree angle.

That's definitely not the world I live in so I have to absolutely agree with your point.
Am sorry here but can you explain your analogy for Water🤷‍♂️ am a bit confused 😂
 

Nukehasslefan

Midfield
Your arguement in relation to water and Earth not being a globe🤷‍♂️
Very simple.
Pour water into a container and it will find its level. always.

You'll never find any level on any convex curve.
You can argue for gravity if you want but it's an argument based on absolutely no proof.
 

DPTT

Winger
Very simple.
Pour water into a container and it will find its level. always.

You'll never find any level on any convex curve.
You can argue for gravity if you want but it's an argument based on absolutely no proof.
You saying gravity is a hoax?
 

Top