Nukehasslefan
Winger
Back to the stick?
Can you tell me how a stick proves a rotating globe?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Back to the stick?
Can you explain the “science” to back this up instead of just words?Atmospheric mass over distance would lose that sunlight/heat.
He’s not a lunatic mate he’s a wum and he’s reeling you in. Ignore him and he eventually shuts up or goes away. He is no more a flat earther than you or me.You really are an absolute lunatic
How do you explain the different seasons, time zones, the fact that the southern hemisphere's seasons differ to ours? That round yellow thing in the sky illuminates different parts of the planet at different times. That wouldnt happen if the planet was flat you absolute nut job.
It explains it in the article mate, in fact it explains it in many articles. You can read cant you?Back to the stick?
Can you tell me how a stick proves a rotating globe?
Point us in the direction of the scientific proof of this please.Atmospheric mass over distance would lose that sunlight/heat.
Simple observation can clear it up.Can you explain the “science” to back this up instead of just words?
Can you explain rather than just deflecting the question please?Has nobody ever wondered how we feel wind and such and yet we can stand up to it but then we are told the so called spinning Earth carries everything with it in unison?
This gets brought up many times and people argue that the atmosphere is dragged along with the solid rotating ground and sea and yet a helicopter hovers and is said to also be dragged along with that very same atmosphere but then we get told to look at a coriolis effect.
Does nobody question this stuff?
Simple observation can clear it up.
Just like anything over distance being obscured by atmospheric mass.
He’s not a lunatic mate he’s a wum and he’s reeling you in. Ignore him and he eventually shuts up or goes away. He is no more a flat earther than you or me.
Explains what?It explains it in the article mate, in fact it explains it in many articles. You can read cant you?
Point us in the direction of the scientific proof of this please.
I think I've just explained.Can you explain rather than just deflecting the question please?
No you made a general comment without and scientific dataExplains what?
Do you know what it explains and if so, tell me how it works with the spinning globe we're told about?
I think I've just explained.
If you don't want to see that then, no issue here.
How about you tell me how atmosphere gets dragged along with the ground in perfect unison, enough to also drag along a hovering helicopter in perfect unison.No you made a general comment without and scientific data
That’s what am after
How about you tell us the scientific basis for your claims that was originally asked of you, instead of deflecting the questionHow about you tell me how atmosphere gets dragged along with the ground in perfect unison, enough to also drag along a hovering helicopter in perfect unison.
Can you explain it because I see and feel something different.
I think it's self explanatory.How about you tell us the scientific basis for your claims that was originally asked of you, instead of deflecting the question
You are either a wind up or a complete thicko
Yet more deflecting, thickoI think it's self explanatory.
What isn't self explanatory is why this supposedly happens on a spinning globe.
Can you answer that?
It's already like that mate...clever ones on the top, angry grafters underneath, and hopefully it remains like thatOne side should be office workers and other side should be proper grafters imo
No deflecting.Yet more deflecting, thicko
No mate, how about you answer with scientific data what you are proposingHow about you tell me how atmosphere gets dragged along with the ground in perfect unison, enough to also drag along a hovering helicopter in perfect unison.
Can you explain it because I see and feel something different.
Yep and I'm questioning the spinning globe and gave my reason as one instance.No mate, how about you answer with scientific data what you are proposing
Remember I think the Earth is a globe you don’t
Your reason without any real data thoughYep and I'm questioning the spinning globe and gave my reason as one instance.
Can you answer it?
Nope, I have no intention into getting into a science discussion with you. Having read & ignored enough of your rubbish on other reads my original comment was to give my opinion of you and make a statement.There is no proof of a spinning Earth, imo.
You can't validate yourself, right?
If you can then show me how you know you're living on a spinning globe.
My validation is simply taking apart what we are told, in many aspects and one solid observable, testable and repeatable test of water level and it conforming to the container it is in, not conforming to a convex curve.
No problem. I have no issue with that.Your reason without any real data though
I trust the 1000’s of scientists who have spent their lives researching everything you refute mate
Proof of what?From the top of the cliffs in Dover I can see France, but at sea level I cannot. If you deny this as proof, you also have to deny the geometry you use to ascend stairs...think about it.
And don't come back with "I live in a Bungalow"