Roker Mackem
Striker
I thought it might have been raised but obviously there were too many posts to scroll back through .
Her gait could be caused by either having recently dismounted a horse or having shat herself.
Or she has Huntingdons Disease
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought it might have been raised but obviously there were too many posts to scroll back through .
Her gait could be caused by either having recently dismounted a horse or having shat herself.
Showing my age, but does that mean KLD will revive Sgt Peppers in Sunderland?She's promoting investment in the region as she's modelling the new Geordie Jeans range coming soon as they revive the brand
Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
Well there’s a whole load of other explanations but fortunately you and I are too gentlemanly to get into all that!Or having a Saudi hand up there controlling her like a puppet![]()
And the NUFC lgbtq group welcomed themAny Newcastle player heard saying that gay people should be locked up - would be banned for 6+ games .
yet the premier league have sold Newcastle to the person responsible for implementing and enforcing the jailing of gay people - the assassination of a journalist - and the denial of basic human rights to women
we have to keep spreading the word of just what the Saudis and Newcastle stand for .
Joking aside, this!Or she has Huntingdons Disease
Has to be doneShe's promoting investment in the region as she's modelling the new Geordie Jeans range coming soon as they revive the brand
Logon or register to see this image
Logon or register to see this image
To be fair, there have been condemnations of the Saudi regime in True Faith and even within the LGBT statement. Maybe not enough, maybe not as aggressive, but they're there.To be fair I think the fans are being mentioned as one because there has been almost no dissenting voices. If there were a few daft lads with tea towels on their head celebrating, but also a supporters Trust and an LGBTQ group talking about their serious misgivings, if a good percentage of fans on social media were expressing their dissatisfaction with the Saudis being in charge of their club, then they'd maybe have to be careful to say which group of fans they mean. As it is, there's been at best silence from some, and celebration /defending the regime from the rest. Until some mags really come out against it, they'll be lumped together as all accepting it
Canny bit of whataboutery there.Useful idiots was a term coined by the KGB for people like Michael Foot & Jack Jones during the cold war
Surperb analogy in this case.
Strange that supporters can feel such moral outrage when the stadium renamed after a pay day loan company but celebrate when its taken over by one of the cruelest, most evil governments on the planet
Woke lefty smug guardian journalist iircWhy does the SMB hate Squires?
And he developed an excellent inter-connected autobahn systemWhen not organising the holocaust, vegetarian Adolf Hitler was exceptionally gentle with animals and loved relaxing with his water colours.
How many voices, in some way, are defending their owners? This is the difference, it's the level at which some of the Mags are getting so defensive about it all and I can't think of any other club that goes to the levels the Mags do.To be fair, there have been condemnations of the Saudi regime in True Faith and even within the LGBT statement. Maybe not enough, maybe not as aggressive, but they're there.
I agree the Trust should have had some balls and, in their open letter to the new owners asked for a conversation about the concerns that many of their members have.
Re: your last statement, it's not really fair to lump an entire fanbase in one camp simply because you feel there are insufficient dissenting voices. Be like saying All Man City fans are supportive of UAE because there aren't enough dissenting voices.
I’d love somebody to Tweet that to Downie
my first thought!Bloody hell, 1999 rang, it wants its jeans back.
See, that's a mischaracterisation. You could count on one hand the number of daft lads in headscarves/bedsheets.But is it swings and roundabouts? How did you expect other (non-Newcastle supporting) folk to react when the first and most obvious demonstration of the takeover news on Tyneside was a mass gathering at SJP of tea-towel/bedsheet wearing, lager-swilling f***ing numpties celebrating becoming the richest club in the world (allegedly). If it was a celebration of the removal of MA then fine, but it wasn't was it, not in a million years. Every one of those people outside SJP never for one moment considered the implications of the takeover and the people behind it. If they had and realised who they were even tacitly condoning they wouldn't have done it. If they DID consider it and simply thought "nah fuck it, I'm on the lash" (pun intended) then they deserve everything that's came their way. The savaging of the rest of your support, and by extension the club, is the unintended consequence of that. It was both gormless and classless.
I was using irony, to be clear...Shame the Daily Mail condemned this takeover and the Times....and the New York Times...
And still on the subject of quotes:Goes back to the early days of Stalin when it was applied to the like of Sydney and Beatrice Webb.
Classic. Have a like.alexa, show me an example of people changing their mind
David Squires