Fred Basset
Winger
That is very true
-
The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.
NUFC and other Sportswashing Spring 2022
- Thread starter Bob Fleming
- Start date
- Status
Our club isn't ruined
wednesday1957
Midfield
I find it annoying mate
There's been a myth mainly created by the media
I wouldn't be daft enough not to admit they have good support,have a rich history and had some good sides,but there are a fair few clubs the same that don't get half the coverage and have been through far more crap than Newcastle have.
Have your loyalty tested down here for a few years ,then see if halfway up the Prem is such a miserable place to be sitting
When they had Ashley it was all you heard on the radio,while other clubs were virtually going to the wall,annoyed the hell out of me
Now this with the Saudis...
Now tell me who a bad owner is?
..Ashley or some regime that executes 80 folk in one day?
Shouldn't really be a question should it
Ashley wasn’t a bad owner.
We, as supporters, have no sway over what the media say.
My experience is that football fans are, in the main, the same regardless of the team they support. All clubs have a percentage of idiots however the majors are just normal folk who enjoy a day out with their mates, a few beers, a bit of piss taking and in most cases a vein hope of winning.
Halfway up the premiership sounds great to you. Your situation will sound great to a fan of Exeter, who in turn are way better off than fans of Bury.
Exile 1968
Winger
You must be logged on to see media items
wednesday1957
Midfield
Get your point mate..but not entirely true when your team has actually been there
Exeter haven't, nor had Bury
Mate you’ve won something relatively recently compared to us up here. You don’t know you’re born !!
Always had a soft spot for the Owls. My cousin played for you back in the 80’s so I was Hillsborough a lot.
Goes without saying I hope you beat our red n white brothers to promotion…
D
Deleted member 1169
Guest
I am beginning to think we are all being whoosed as no one in their right mind believes this.
- They are funded by the government (40bn of fx reserves and 80bn of Aramco shares recently). They do not have a magic money tree;
- The mags are only the richest club in the world by virtue of being owned by the Saudi's. Much of the PIF investments are very illiquid.
- The Chair of PIF is MBS and he presented the 5 year plan;
- No one proved separation. The Saudi's issued a royal decree to say PIF and KSA were separate. This was accepted by the PL with vague (unenforceable) threats if it was proven otherwise. There is a good chance MBS isn't even aware of the mags but if there is a vote of political significance somewhere down the line only a fool would pretend he would not have influence on this;
Flea Market Trader
Striker
Fancy getting your knickers in such a twist and throwing your toys out the pram because someone on a football forum has a different opinion to you, and then calling them a fanny
Oh the irony!Take your genocide enabling fannyness up the road where it’s more accepted. Knob
Nope, it's an opinion. One with which I disagree.Yes because I openly admit I'd love our club to have all that wealth I'm a bot
People just need to be honest to themselves. The vast majority of SAFC fans would love it to have been us. That's a fact.
You’re in denial lad, or simply Sportswashed. Do you also believe that Putin was telling the truth when he said that the Russians went into Ukraine as peacekeepers?
The club is owned by the Saudi state, simple as that. Who do you think owns and runs PIF?
As far as I’m aware, there is currently nothing in the O&D test that prevents a state from owning a club. The written assurances given by the Saudi’s was that as shadow directors, the state (MBS) would not get involved in the decision making at the club.
Flea Market Trader
Striker
One of the worst this idiot if you ask me and yes he’s been outed
When they say the Saudis promised not to get involved in the decision making at the club what they mean by that is they will actually make all of the decisions and have someone else as a spokesperson to pretend they are doing it. This is how it works.
Last edited:
Lovemore
Midfield
It’s inexcusable. Forget sport. This is real. No one can defend this with their intellect.
Wake up all you silly mags getting on this thread and spouting your nonsense.
That’s more important to you than who owns the club? Not having a pop. Genuine question?
The self pitying of this one is off the scale.Mad snivel
if they arent linked to the saudi state in any way, why did the PL get a legally binding document that said the saudi state wouldnt "interfere" in running the club? did they do the same for abramovic?
in the real world, the crown prince will tell PIF and the puppet who is their chairman where to spend its money, given he runs it, and authorize them to buy another striker. then spend a few more million on missiles to bomb kids.
Roker Mackem
Striker
Nah. We maybe could have done a bit more but what would it have changed that didnt happen anyway?
wednesday1957
Midfield
who was your cousin mate?
Anybody ???
Telling a Sheff Wed fan he doesn't know he was born.This is the level of delusional self pity you use,to justify your defending of your paedophile owner.
By the way,how do you feel about your owner being a paedophile.?You have never answered this
Last edited:
- Status
