SAFC Wilks
Striker
I know mate, was more tongue in cheek comment really.I’m sure it won’t mate.
Times are always darkest before the dawn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know mate, was more tongue in cheek comment really.I’m sure it won’t mate.
Times are always darkest before the dawn
That doesn't matter to Hank, it's in the DM so therefore bollocks.Trouble is Hank it's now being reported everywhere.
So you dont think an apology will be on it's way then?
Now according to Chris your comment here constitutes as slander, he wasnt part of any deal for the club.... wouldnt it be ironic if you were spreading mistruths on the same thread you accused others of doing so towards you?
It just f***ing stinks. They’ve come in and rolled the dice on instant promotion and fucked it.
they’ve not put any sort of long term plan in place and used the academy as some sort of fire sale. He hired all his mates with no pedigree at all to work at a club of this size.
he then fucked up our best chance of being owned by some people with real finance clout to drive us forward.
his decision making has been f***ing shocking. to pay that money for will grigg was utterly mental. At the time I thought he was the answer but not at that figure.
then there’s the contracts running out or running down with no indication of renewals happening.
they exactly what they’ve been described as, chancers and cowboys. stay much longer and it’ll be the end of us.
can someone make a simple, easy to understand animated video of like where all the money moved around so a thick northerner like me can understand it? I don’t understand football finances but it doesn’t take a genius to know there’s a rabbit away somewhere.
He didn't say he was part of it he said he was close to it.So you dont think an apology will be on it's way then?
Now according to Chris your comment here constitutes as slander, he wasnt part of any deal for the club.... wouldnt it be ironic if you were spreading mistruths on the same thread you accused others of doing so towards you?
1. Parachute payment comes into SAFC.
2. Parachute payment moves from SAFC to Madrox
3. Parachute payment moves from Madrox to Drumaville
4. Parachute payment moves from Drumaville to SBC.
Step 2 created the balance between SAFC and Madrox which has now apparently been written off.
Or basically a man who can not afford to buy and run safc uses the club's parachute payments to buy the club, saying it will be repaid. Now, with this figures, it's not going to be and written off as exceptional loss.
Or basically a man who can not afford to buy and run safc uses the club's parachute payments to buy the club, saying it will be repaid. Now, with this figures, it's not going to be and written off as exceptional loss.
1. Parachute payment comes into SAFC.
2. Parachute payment moves from SAFC to Madrox
3. Parachute payment moves from Madrox to Drumaville
4. Parachute payment moves from Drumaville to SBC.
Step 2 created the balance between SAFC and Madrox which has now apparently been written off.
Or basically a man who can not afford to buy and run safc uses the club's parachute payments to buy the club, saying it will be repaid. Now, with this figures, it's not going to be and written off as exceptional loss.
No, no, no, no, no. That part of the deal had nothing to do with the cost of the shares in the club. It was purely to pay off the debt that Short had moved into Drumaville to give the impression of debt free (although the club really wasn't). That part was always gong to met using some of the parachute.
Do you think this is legal/ethical/typical practice?1. Parachute payment comes into SAFC.
2. Parachute payment moves from SAFC to Madrox
3. Parachute payment moves from Madrox to Drumaville
4. Parachute payment moves from Drumaville to SBC.
Step 2 created the balance between SAFC and Madrox which has now apparently been written off.
Exactly but he did tell us this on that radio interview he did. Or rather said he will put it back as required but he doesn’t have to if he doesn’t want to. Really we should all have played holy hell then
1.Use the parachute money to buy the club
2. Get an easy promotion to the championship first season
3. Sell club for a profit and use part of the profit to pay back the club.
^ This was the plan imo, Donald reckoned he that had to prove ‘x’ amount in the bank to buy the club but as soon as he came in he was looking for a loan due to unexpected costs. Things been a mess from there.
but the parachute payments went towards financing a club debt which is kind of what they’re designed for, am I wrong? Or are you saying the SBC loan was taken out by an external company (Drumaville) and had nothing to do with the club (SAFC LTD.)? So the clubs money was used to pay off a debt taken on by an external party?1. Parachute payment comes into SAFC.
2. Parachute payment moves from SAFC to Madrox
3. Parachute payment moves from Madrox to Drumaville
4. Parachute payment moves from Drumaville to SBC.
Step 2 created the balance between SAFC and Madrox which has now apparently been written off.
Aye Charlie said that at a RAWA meeting too I think. No obligation to pay back the funds and any that’s paid back is out of good will.