• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Leicester City PSR breach.

You must be logged on to see media items
this is where I am confused. Football seasons here in England run to 30th June no matter when you are promoted or relegated. on 1st July a new season starts. registrations, player contracts, transfers etc are all tied into the new season starting on 1st July and have done for a very long time. Why do Leicester now get to decide that this doesn't apply to them?
 

Tis ruling will only hasten the arrival and widen the scope of the new football regulator to be introduced by the Government. What I suspect will now happen is that there will be common PSR regulations covering at least the top four divisions, defined and enforced by the regulator, which will also licence the clubs. The problem specific to this situation will thus go away. The regulator will be the same no matter what division you're in.
 
Football isn’t like any other business really, if it were no one in their right mind would buy a club. Owning a club basically consists of making yourself poorer year on year except for a few clubs. And the only way of making a decent wedge is when you sell it to the next sucker that wants to make himself poorer😂
football clubs are indirectly very profitable...they raise the business profile of the owner.
David Sullivan at west ham said he has made a fortune from football because of the contacts he made through it enabling other business deals..the profit on those deals more than made up for what he has spent on the clubs he has owned..
and of course his west ham stake is worth multiples of what he put in
 
this is where I am confused. Football seasons here in England run to 30th June no matter when you are promoted or relegated. on 1st July a new season starts. registrations, player contracts, transfers etc are all tied into the new season starting on 1st July and have done for a very long time. Why do Leicester now get to decide that this doesn't apply to them?

Not all clubs have a year end of 30 June. Some are 31 May, ours is 31 August and, bizarrely, Plymouth's is 31 December. The 30 June relates solely to player contracts, and is just an adopted convention. This year the transfer window started on 14 June. The season starts when the first game takes place - that's why there are pre-season friendlies. Leicester ceased to be a member of the PL when the 23/24 season ended, and had to transfer their PL share to Luton once the playoff result was known.
 
Not all clubs have a year end of 30 June. Some are 31 May, ours is 31 August and, bizarrely, Plymouth's is 31 December. The 30 June relates solely to player contracts, and is just an adopted convention. This year the transfer window started on 14 June. The season starts when the first game takes place - that's why there are pre-season friendlies. Leicester ceased to be a member of the PL when the 23/24 season ended, and had to transfer their PL share to Luton once the playoff result was known.
Why is that the case mate?
 
Not all clubs have a year end of 30 June. Some are 31 May, ours is 31 August and, bizarrely, Plymouth's is 31 December. The 30 June relates solely to player contracts, and is just an adopted convention. This year the transfer window started on 14 June. The season starts when the first game takes place - that's why there are pre-season friendlies. Leicester ceased to be a member of the PL when the 23/24 season ended, and had to transfer their PL share to Luton once the playoff result was known.
I am not talking about clubs own accounting year end, I am talking about the PL and EFL's official year end, which have for many years been 30th June.
 
Back
Top