ravydavygravy
Striker
What did she say that was incorrect?
It's the way she says it mate. She's just as bad as abu hamza and their ilk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What did she say that was incorrect?
I haven't trawled through all of this thread, is there any substance or is it all just virtue signalling?
That people are 'afraid' and 'ununited'.What did she say that was incorrect?
I've worked with charities set up to collect hate crimes. Her publications most definitely fit the bill in terms of what the police recognise as.
I just ignore her.Not even worth mentioning.
Well go and work with real people instead of minorities and find out what the real view of the British people is.
ThisShe is extremely good at what she does. If people are daft enough to get hoity toity about it then that's what she takes advantage of.
And thisThe amount of advertising revenue she must bring in is outrageous.
Hideous human being.
Also thisKatie Hopkins seeks to use a terrorist attack to deliberately offend people with inflammatory remarks, what a surprise.
Along with thisShe's just an attention seeking old witch.
Plus thismaking a fortune out of people getting outraged over her comments. she must laugh all the way to the bank.
Or prefixed with " I'm not being funny"It's more often than not the case that when people 'tell it like it is', they are talking absolute shit.
Such statements are normally concluded with 'just saying...'
You definitely need to visit the vet. Statements like that have convinced me that you and your fuzzy little swingers need to part company.I think she's canny, wad!
Well go and work with real people instead of minorities and find out what the real view of the British people is.
She's never far from the truth. The fact that people are more outraged by what she says than a terrorist mowing down and stabbing people speaks volumes of the attitude of people in this country
She is extremely good at what she does. If people are daft enough to get hoity toity about it then that's what she takes advantage of.
What she needs is a good shagging.
Extremely good at what?
Addressing issues in a completely black and white manner with zero nuance or middle ground? Confirming a pre exhististing agenda with no investigation and lies if need be? Being simplistic, inflammatory and popularist on complicated issues?
Virtually anyone could do what she does. Half the idiots on here could if only they hadn't learnt to spell using a Nokia
It's rubbish to suggest anybody could do it. Well, anywhere near as well as Hopkins does it. There's a reason she's talked about and reposted and clicked through to more than any other.
There's a reason as she has marketed herself very well as public enemy no1. I'll give her that. But There's no skill in how or what she writes about. It's simple answers to complicated questions confirming pre existing opinions held by dullards
There's a reason as she has marketed herself very well as public enemy no1. I'll give her that. But There's no skill in how or what she writes about. It's simple answers to complicated questions confirming pre existing opinions held by dullards