dangermows
Striker
A teacher doing it is definitely worse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
cos he's a ex England and premier league footballer so it'll sell papers. For it's really shows how stupid Johnson really is as he was clearly getting set up , yet continued to open his mouth..He's clearly must have said similar before for someone to video it...Well my main point was about it not doing the victim any favours. She will read this and it will presumably upset her quite a bit. Why couldn't the Sun get the footage and just send it in to NOMS if they were that concerned about it? Putting it online just rams it in the victim's face imo.
cos he's a ex England and premier league footballer so it'll sell papers. For it's really shows how stupid Johnson really is as he was clearly getting set up , yet continued to open his mouth..He's clearly must have said similar before for someone to video it...
He's not a paedo
He is thick as mince and deserves all he gets...If he had done it in France no one would have any issue with it. He's an idiot.
It was clearly a set upWere they standing there with big cameras, lighting and with mics on the go?
He is thick as mince and deserves all he gets...
This.He's not a paedo
Not true. It's a criminal offence punishable by up to 2 years custody. And you're a copIt's not like. It's not even an offence just contraband.
He's not doing himself any favours. Best he keeps his head down and his gob shut.
I didn't have a pop - I asked if your point was that it's ok for people to think like that.
Believe it or not, past comments can be relevant as they're not mutually exclusive from people's views expressed here.
Well my main point was about it not doing the victim any favours. She will read this and it will presumably upset her quite a bit. Why couldn't the Sun get the footage and just send it in to NOMS if they were that concerned about it? Putting it online just rams it in the victim's face imo.
Never ceases to amaze me how the same posters flock to these threads to pick from the following shite arguments
'His sentence was too harsh'
'He was penalised for being a footballer'
'The headline is sensationalist'
'Other people have done worse'
'There are other crimes that are worse'
'She was nearly an adult'
'He's not a paedophile'
'The paper reporting this was a disgrace'
are the ones who get so terribly affronted at the suggestion they are defending him.
No excuses, no mitigation, end of story IMO.
It's the sun we're on about Fletch. Their grip on reality is tenuous at the best of times, they have demonstrated countless times in the past they will go to press with anything and everything that generates income, regardless of veracity. It's one of the down sides of having a relatively free press. The people that buy it, and the ones that lap up this drivel need to have a word with themselves because as long as it sells the sun will keep printing it.This is the thing that boils my piss. Yes, he's a f***ing arsehole. YES he abused his position. BUT, he IS NOT A PAEDO!
Nothing to do with us anymore .Aye, lets just bury our heads in the sand
But I do think his sentence was too harsh
Why is this a shit argument?
At the time after his trial, when people were saying "ah well he didnt do anything wrong really" I was one of the main posters saying what he did was wrong, that it was an abuse of power/ trust and it was completely inappropriate behaviour.
But I still think the sentence was too long. I often read cases and think "that sentence was too long" or "that sentence was too short". Do you not? Do you think every sentence is right?
I don't see what the issue is with disagreeing with the length of his sentence. It has fuck all to do with him playing for us. I thought it was shameful he was still allowed to play once he was charged. I do think he deserved to be punished. But 6 years? Nah.
I wonder how many of those people would have dobbed him into the polis had they been privy to his goings on before the whole thing blew up in his face? I'll wager a fair percentage would have had the view that they were better off protecting the reputation of the club rather than doing the right thing.Never ceases to amaze me how the same posters flock to these threads to pick from the following shite arguments
'His sentence was too harsh'
'He was penalised for being a footballer'
'The headline is sensationalist'
'Other people have done worse'
'There are other crimes that are worse'
'She was nearly an adult'
'He's not a paedophile'
'The paper reporting this was a disgrace'
are the ones who get so terribly affronted at the suggestion they are defending him.
No excuses, no mitigation, end of story IMO.
I wonder how many of those people would have dobbed him into the polis had they been privy to his goings on before the whole thing blew up in his face? I'll wager a fair percentage would have had the view that they were better off protecting the reputation of the club rather than doing the right thing.