I
Icarebecauseyoudo
Guest
Good cameras for low costGot an old Ricoh upstairs somewhere. Bought it about 25 years ago. Still like new, it's only had about 10 roles of film through it. Think only had half of them developed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good cameras for low costGot an old Ricoh upstairs somewhere. Bought it about 25 years ago. Still like new, it's only had about 10 roles of film through it. Think only had half of them developed.
Think I paid about £300 ish for all the kit. Bought it for mrs. K as a b/d present. She was modelling back then and wanted to learn the other side of the camera so to speak. Needless to say she used it once.Good cameras for low cost
You missed your chance to be the next Ben DoverThink I paid about £300 ish for all the kit. Bought it for mrs. K as a b/d present. She was modelling back then and wanted to learn the other side of the camera so to speak. Needless to say she used it once.
I didn't, we just forgot the cameraYou missed your chance to be the next Ben Dover
I didn't, we just forgot the camera
Skeletor has a GX617, it'll piss on your shitI shoot 35mm and MF. Yashica Electro 35, Pentax KM and Hasselblad 500Cm. B&W and colour. Develop my film in the kitchen. C-41 can be messy but great fun. Digital can't compete with MF film imo
Nice!Skeletor has a GX617, it'll piss on your shit
I sold him it
Eh?Nice!
I sold my rollei for 650 on ebay a few years back. Still no idea why it went for so much, was expecting 250I still have a few 35mm cameras (Nikon F series SLRs and a little Olympus mju-ii compact) and use them regularly. Perfectly good enough for enlargements up to 12x8 and a pleasure to use. Also have a Rolleicord 6x6 TLR and Fuji 6x9 rangefinder.
Obviously was a flex not a cord for that money. Fancy one mesel but in truth the Rolleicord is almost as good, more compact and lighter, not to mention only costing about 150.I sold my rollei for 650 on ebay a few years back. Still no idea why it went for so much, was expecting 250
Must have been the lens type I guess
It was a flex, but I still expected lower
Zeiss 3.5 planar iirc
Was in good nick likePrices on them vary hugely depending on which model (despite the fact that any made since about 1950 are pretty much identical given the same lens) and condition (with collectors driving up prices on anything approaching mintiness). The Zeiss Planar ones also get a premium though it is impossible to see the difference between them and the Schneider lenses... Again more collector snobbery.