D
Deleted member 27423
Guest
Very generous and easy going people.Love you too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very generous and easy going people.Love you too.
I doubt these people are turkish either so its hardly solving the crisis. Just rearranging the deckchairs on the titanic.Sending them back.
Greek Government To Return 10,000 Migrants Back To Turkey
Greek government spokesman Stelios Petsas said the Mitsotakis government plans to return a total of 10,000 migrants within 2020.greekcitytimes.com
There's a reason they didn't stop in Turkey, they'll move on again.I doubt these people are turkish either so its hardly solving the crisis. Just rearranging the deckchairs on the titanic.
Turkey have about 3 million asylum seekers atm and they're occasionally moving tens of thousands on. Greece are sending them back.There's a reason they didn't stop in Turkey, they'll move on again.
Good on them, Europe as a whole should have sent them back as well.Turkey have about 3 million asylum seekers atm and they're occasionally moving tens of thousands on. Greece are sending them back.
Your a bit of a wanker mind on the quiet.What a f***ing mess of a post. Learn how to use apostrophes.
Refugees
mams
Dads
It’s
And it’s f***ing their
@Aituk7 is absolutely shit scared of being raped by a Muslim isn’t he? You can feel it in every one of his posts. What a way to live your life, constantly looking over your shoulder. Horrendous.
I had a quick read. Turkey has 3.6 million asylum seekers from syria alone. there's nothing to send them back to.Good on them, Europe as a whole should have sent them back as well.
The vast majority of migrants across Europe at the time weren't refugees. But for the actual refugees (i'm not sure of the numbers but I'll take your word for it)I had a quick read. Turkey has 3.6 million asylum seekers from syria alone. there's nothing to send them back to.
That's exactly what's happening. 3.6 million from syria alone though - that's too many for one country to manageThe vast majority of migrants across Europe at the time weren't refugees. But for the actual refugees (i'm not sure of the numbers but I'll take your word for it)
The UN should have had a vote on the whether the world contribute to an extensive temporary housing and relief programme or not.
And if it passed the world contributes with the closest nations, turkey for example. housing these people in purpose built aid camps staffed by doctors, aid workers etc.
No it isn'tThat's exactly what's happening
Not the un, but the eu. They've paid turkey billions to build the camps. But turkey has now stopped registering asylum seekers. Any more shit in iran or syria, the next nearest country to turkey is....No it isn't
It's disgraceful how much of a damp squib the UN has become. Taken over by self righteous nonsense peddlers.Not the un, but the eu. They've paid turkey billions to build the camps. But turkey has now stopped registering asylum seekers. Any more shit in iran or syria, the next nearest country to turkey is....
With turkey having multiple million refugees already, it looks like the un is asking the eu to bear the brunt of the next wave
Protecting refugees in Europe: UNHCR calls for a ‘year of change’
The UN refugee agency (UNHCR) is calling on the European Union (EU) to make 2020 “the year of change for robust refugee protection”. On Thursday, the agency issued a set of new recommendations, as Croatia and German preside over the EU Council during the next 12 months.news.un.org
WE can’t feed or house the people who are already living in the U.K.5th biggest economy in the world, we could take them all in Europe if it was down to only money
We could if we chose too.WE can’t feed or house the people who are already living in the U.K.
Probably but the poor people will always be shafted.We could if we chose too.
Like they are now.Probably but the poor people will always be shafted.
I read an interesting article about land ownership in England.Like they are now.
It’s an idealistic view but our wealth could sort out so much shite
Land doesn’t mean wealth ( in hand). I know lots of land owners who don’t have a pot to piss in but asset rich. Their kids getting free school meals but there not much cash about. Are they rich? I’d argue not but these individuals are also on receiving end of the finger pointing in the class war where people class them as privileged.I read an interesting article about land ownership in England.
We need a peasant’s rebellion to redistribute the wealth.