Dan..Dan..Dan..Dan
Striker
37 test match average.You don't think stokes would change much
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
37 test match average.You don't think stokes would change much
If our top order keeps getting out for under 50, not massively though we would obviously still be better for having him in the team, I don't think the outcome would differ massivelyYou don't think stokes would change much
37 test match average.
Somehow, we're still in this
Why don't we pick and choose? Just use the innings where he has scored more than 75. Even better. He will indeed improve the side but can't make up for the shambles at the top of the order.I think it’s probably better to go off Stokes record in his last 40-50 tests rather than his first 20-30. That average will be above 37
Feed heavy duty cider to the tramps?what is there to do in or around Brum on a day with no cricket? Anyone know?
Why don't we pick and choose? Just use the innings where he has scored more than 75. Even better. He will indeed improve the side but can't make up for the shambles at the top of the order.
Yes, it is silly, but selecting particular criteria of a player's career is usually just an attempt to support an opinion.That’s just silly. The Ben Stokes of the last 40 tests is a very different one to the earlier career. The same way that Anderson is a very different bowler producing different results now to the one in the earlier stages of his career.