Duke of York Epstein interview. Tomorrow @ 9pm.

TwasOnTheFifthOfMay said:
This is bollocks. If you can't sweat you'd have to pant, like a dog.

When he says "military personnel" it kind of implies those in the real thick of it.
Click to expand...
You do know that there is a difference between canine and human physiology don’t you? Just because he says he wasn’t capable of doing one thing that a human body can do to cool down doesn’t mean that he could do what a dog does to achieve the same thing instead. All that panting would do is make him hyperventilate in all probability.
 


Are we allowed to post satirical videos on this subject or do we get an immediate and long lasting ban. There's a really funny version of Prince's "When Doves Cry" kicking around :lol:
 
Evil Jimmy Krankie said:
You do know that there is a difference between canine and human physiology don’t you? Just because he says he wasn’t capable of doing one thing that a human body can do to cool down doesn’t mean that he could do what a dog does to achieve the same thing instead. All that panting would do is make him hyperventilate in all probability.
Click to expand...

Looks like that's another debunking.
 
Evil Jimmy Krankie said:
Don’t really know tbf. Depends if your post was a whoosh or not? Sarcasm and humour doesn’t really travel well across the internet.
Click to expand...
I'm niceonemarra though, the king of idiots.
Look at the BBC mocking Diana, Princess of Wales.

scource
www.bbc.co.uk

BBC Three - High Spirits with Shirley Ghostman, Episode 1

Shirley Ghostman is a psychic able to contact dead celebrities. He contacts Pricess Diana.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

Now they are mocking Prince Andrew with their latest interview.

The Royals are like sitting ducks when it comes to the BBC these days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well it looks like Andrew's memory of specific dates is suspect, as if there was any doubt. Apparently according to a letter to the Times in 2011 by his private secretary Alastair Watson. Andrew first met Epstein in the early 1990s rather than in 1999 as Andrew claimed in the interview. Now if something is committed to writing that is incorrect it should be corrected soon afterwards. The Palace is standing by Andrew's claim of 1999 but if you can't rely on something in writing that has not been corrected how can you rely on something verbal 8 years later?
 
Last edited:
niceonemarra said:
The Royals are like sitting ducks when it comes to the BBC these days.
Click to expand...
You're joking. Have you not seen Nicholas Witchell's brown-nosing news pieces? And so-called top journalists referring to them as Her Majesty this and Your Royal Highness that? Someone at the BBC has decided that their news department has to buy into all the crap.
 
Manny F said:
You're joking. Have you not seen Nicholas Witchell's brown-nosing news pieces? And so-called top journalists referring to them as Her Majesty this and Your Royal Highness that? Someone at the BBC has decided that their news department has to buy into all the crap.
Click to expand...
No I haven't mate have you got a link?
 

Back
Top