Defund the BBC - discuss

What top stuff do you watch on channel 5? Go on, you have asked me for stuff from bbc.
Don’t watch anything on channel 5 really, but that’s not to say folks that watch the poverty porn they put on should have to pay the bbc for the pleasure.
this is the madness of the system people may not want anything the bbc offers but anything produced and watched live on another station the bbc have to be paid.
 
Last edited:


Don’t watch anything on channel 5 really, but that’s not to say folks that watch the poverty porn they put on should have to pay the bbc for the pleasure.
What do you watch then?Gimme some quality shows that aren't on bbc. I think you secretly watch the bbc, but don't agree with paying for it.
 
What do you watch then?Gimme some quality shows that aren't on bbc. I think you secretly watch the bbc, but don't agree with paying for it.
Normally just stream, so stuff like slow horses recently, films on the streaming services, sky box sets etc etc.
live tv wise it’ll pretty much be football
its not even a money thing as I pay the subscriptions for things I’ll want, it’s the no choice but to pay bbc that’s silly
 
Last edited:
Normally just stream, so stuff like slow horses recently, films on the streaming services, sky box sets etc etc.
live tv wise it’ll pretty much be football
its not even a money thing as I pay the subscriptions for things I’ll want, it’s the no choice but to pay bbc that’s silly
You don't have to pay the TV licence to stream stuff,do you? Why pay it?
 

Will the BBC remain a credible news source?

Incredible that they try and paint Britain as the aggressor in this story.
Britain was there trying to stop the slave trade. In order to protect the local Africans from being enslaved by the Asante (who also wished to extend their empire), the British ended up fighting with them, eventually winning and putting a stop to their slave trade and human sacrifice.

Bbc: "Britian looted gold from the Asante people"
"Europeans were attracted to what they later named the Gold Coast by the stories of African wealth and Britain fought repeated battles with the Asante in the 19th Century.
In 1874 after an Asante attack, British troops launched a "punitive expedition", in the colonial language of the time, ransacking Kumasi and taking many of the palace treasures."
"types of agreements are seen by others as a way for Britain to confront the cultural legacy of its colonial past"

You couldn't make it up (oh they have)
 
Last edited:

Will the BBC remain a credible news source?

Incredible that they try and paint Britain as the aggressor in this story.
Britain was there trying to stop the slave trade. In order to protect the local Africans from being enslaved by the Asante (who also wished to extend their empire), the British ended up fighting with them, eventually winning and putting a stop to their slave trade and human sacrifice.

Bbc: "Britian looted gold from the Asante people"
"Europeans were attracted to what they later named the Gold Coast by the stories of African wealth and Britain fought repeated battles with the Asante in the 19th Century.
In 1874 after an Asante attack, British troops launched a "punitive expedition", in the colonial language of the time, ransacking Kumasi and taking many of the palace treasures."
"types of agreements are seen by others as a way for Britain to confront the cultural legacy of its colonial past"

You couldn't make it up (oh they have)
🤡
 

Will the BBC remain a credible news source?

Incredible that they try and paint Britain as the aggressor in this story.
Britain was there trying to stop the slave trade. In order to protect the local Africans from being enslaved by the Asante (who also wished to extend their empire), the British ended up fighting with them, eventually winning and putting a stop to their slave trade and human sacrifice.

Bbc: "Britian looted gold from the Asante people"
"Europeans were attracted to what they later named the Gold Coast by the stories of African wealth and Britain fought repeated battles with the Asante in the 19th Century.
In 1874 after an Asante attack, British troops launched a "punitive expedition", in the colonial language of the time, ransacking Kumasi and taking many of the palace treasures."
"types of agreements are seen by others as a way for Britain to confront the cultural legacy of its colonial past"

You couldn't make it up (oh they have)
Britian? Where?
 

Will the BBC remain a credible news source?

Incredible that they try and paint Britain as the aggressor in this story.
Britain was there trying to stop the slave trade. In order to protect the local Africans from being enslaved by the Asante (who also wished to extend their empire), the British ended up fighting with them, eventually winning and putting a stop to their slave trade and human sacrifice.

Bbc: "Britian looted gold from the Asante people"
"Europeans were attracted to what they later named the Gold Coast by the stories of African wealth and Britain fought repeated battles with the Asante in the 19th Century.
In 1874 after an Asante attack, British troops launched a "punitive expedition", in the colonial language of the time, ransacking Kumasi and taking many of the palace treasures."
"types of agreements are seen by others as a way for Britain to confront the cultural legacy of its colonial past"

You couldn't make it up (oh they have)
Disappointingly, none of that would surprise me about the BBC. I find myself turning it off more frequently every week as time goes by.
 
Disappointingly, none of that would surprise me about the BBC. I find myself turning it off more frequently every week as time goes by.
I’ve started to read the FT more often instead of the BBC; our employer has a subscription so I don’t need to pay.

As well as learning about inflation, interest rates and the rail industry, I’m also now an expert on Alexa Chung’s hotpants.





Logon or register to see this image
 
Last edited:

Will the BBC remain a credible news source?

Incredible that they try and paint Britain as the aggressor in this story.
Britain was there trying to stop the slave trade. In order to protect the local Africans from being enslaved by the Asante (who also wished to extend their empire), the British ended up fighting with them, eventually winning and putting a stop to their slave trade and human sacrifice.

Bbc: "Britian looted gold from the Asante people"
"Europeans were attracted to what they later named the Gold Coast by the stories of African wealth and Britain fought repeated battles with the Asante in the 19th Century.
In 1874 after an Asante attack, British troops launched a "punitive expedition", in the colonial language of the time, ransacking Kumasi and taking many of the palace treasures."
"types of agreements are seen by others as a way for Britain to confront the cultural legacy of its colonial past"

You couldn't make it up (oh they have)
You honestly think that's the only reason Britain was there?
 

Will the BBC remain a credible news source?

Incredible that they try and paint Britain as the aggressor in this story.
Britain was there trying to stop the slave trade. In order to protect the local Africans from being enslaved by the Asante (who also wished to extend their empire), the British ended up fighting with them, eventually winning and putting a stop to their slave trade and human sacrifice.
That's great, a victory for what's right.

So, having defeated the Asante, why didn't we leave the gold and artworks for the local Africans we'd liberated from slavery?
 
You honestly think that's the only reason Britain was there?
Britain was there because it took over from the West African Company as they were still trying to trade slaves.
It then protected the coastal tribes from the African slavers, who on top of raiding for slaves, wished to conquer and subjugate them. We've just loaned the looted gold back to them. The bbc think it's a victory.

What other reason do you know of?
 
You don't have to pay the TV licence to stream stuff,do you? Why pay it?
More personal choice than ‘having’ to pay it. I could live quite happily using it as I do and not needing to pay it, I pay it more as I think we need a bbc type public broadcaster in some capacity, and I figure the content I get from radio 4 and podcasts alone is worth chipping something into the pot….radio two is fucked now they’ve dumped Ken in the morning like so it’s greatest hits all the way during the work day

that being said, I’d prefer it as an optional opt in or out service for folks that want to go down that route as well as letting them watch live content that has nothing to do with the bbc whatsoever without having to be taxed for pleasure

It may well mean the bbc is slimmed down massively in years to come, or taking on commercial sponsors and the like but the choice should be there for all
 
Last edited:
That's great, a victory for what's right.

So, having defeated the Asante, why didn't we leave the gold and artworks for the local Africans we'd liberated from slavery?
The local Africans were the slavers.

Do you mean why didn't they pinch it and give it to other Africans?
Don't know.
Maybe just put it towards paying the cost of fighting the slavers
 
Britain was there because it took over from the West African Company as they were still trying to trade slaves.
It then protected the coastal tribes from the African slavers, who on top of raiding for slaves, wished to conquer and subjugate them. We've just loaned the looted gold back to them. The bbc think it's a victory.

What other reason do you know of?
I think it's rather more complicated than that. The last skirmish was down to some British bloke sitting on a sacred golden stool. :lol:
 

Back
Top