Do you reckon they;
A) know they’re conning the public by saying they can communicate
B) genuinely believe they are communicating
Not sure which option makes them more dangerous.
I've just asked Jim Bowen and Doddy and they say it's 'a'
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you reckon they;
A) know they’re conning the public by saying they can communicate
B) genuinely believe they are communicating
Not sure which option makes them more dangerous.
I think some people do seem to be able to tap into the akhashic field and relay amazing personal information
You ever thought of going into politics Muggsy.
You could be somebody's spokesperson.
Well she would with her being Myra Hindley.turns out your real mum only actually gave me a bad dose of Denge fever
Well she would with her being Myra Hindley.
Reported!I f*cked your dead mum.... class
Do you reckon they;
A) know they’re conning the public by saying they can communicate
B) genuinely believe they are communicating
Not sure which option makes them more dangerous.
I remember seeing that documentary on 'Rods', checked for it on youtube a while back but couldnt find it.Ok, cool. I love to read about these kinds of things too, genuinely. id class Quest and Histiry as mainstream though, but do think a lot of news worthy 'happenings' go under reported. Been watchimg some of the Jose Escamilla videos about 'rods' recently, forgot how crazy they were, think I was high as a kite last time I watched them, still mind blowing!
facebook innit.for the skeps on here can you explain where they are getting this information which in many cases isn't even know to the person visiting medium but later checks out
What's the difference, I think mediums pretend to communicate to the dead but what do clairvoyants pretend to do?Is this a thread about Clairvoyants or Mediums ?
I reckon they knew you'd post thisDo you reckon they;
A) know they’re conning the public by saying they can communicate
B) genuinely believe they are communicating
Not sure which option makes them more dangerous.
They pretend to be able to see into the future. Nowt to do with communicating with the dead.What's the difference, I think mediums pretend to communicate to the dead but what do clairvoyants pretend to do?
Isnt seeing in the future a pretedy phycic?They pretend to be able to see into the future. Nowt to do with communicating with the dead.
Sorry for the tragic loss but if the medium could really 'see' the dead he wouldn't be on tour.Well ive posted this on another thread before about being a total sceptic and getting dragged along to a medium gig.
Singled me out of large audience and spoke to me about a mate who tragicaly took his own life, name, where we worked together etc. The medium was a yank touring, so had no local knowledge,
and no im not on facebook.
Certainly scared the sh1t outa me mate.Isnt seeing in the future a pretedy phycic?
Sorry for the tragic loss but if the medium could really 'see' the dead he wouldn't be on tour.