Father Jack Hackett
Striker
Aye, let's pollute our lungs with old diesel motors and then get a virus which attacks them. At least we'll have our civil liberties whilst on ventilators.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not quite a simple as that, say you are an octogenarian with a dicky ticker, you know you haven't got long left, is it right for such a person to be locked away in social isolation? Would it not be humane to inform them of the risks involved, and then allow them to see grandchildren etc.?Aye, let's pollute our lungs with old diesel motors and then get a virus which attacks them. At least we'll have our civil liberties whilst on ventilators.
Or you could argue that people have stopped following the science because they dont believe it is working. I am not saying that lockdowns are wrong, but there is certainly debate out there, that questions their effectiveness. For parliament to pass such legislation with such limited scrutiny is worrying.
How representative of the breadth of scientific thinking is the SAGE committee . I see professor Neil Ferguson is still involved, despite believing that lockdown didn't apply to him, and predicting 200 million worldwide deaths from swine flu when the total was in fact under 200.
Almost like we did something near the start of November that in someway impacted the cases?
Logon or register to see this image
Most people at work and education open as normal isn't a full lockdown by any means.According to that the R rate peaked in mid September and was dropping steadily in the preceding weeks, which correlates with the other graph.
I think it shows that maybe the original Tier system was working but because of “worst case scenario” it was still decided that a full lockdown was needed - it probably wasn’t.
Most people at work and education open as normal isn't a full lockdown by any means.
R was still predicted to be above 1 though which means an increase in spread, albeit as you say slowing down. The lockdown did cause a step change, but was probably too short given it was definitely too late.According to that the R rate peaked in mid September and was dropping steadily in the preceding weeks, which correlates with the other graph.
I think it shows that maybe the original Tier system was working but because of “worst case scenario” it was still decided that a full lockdown was needed - it probably wasn’t.
R was still predicted to be above 1 though which means an increase in spread, albeit as you say slowing down. The lockdown did cause a step change, but was probably too short given it was definitely too late.
I think the original tier system was still too lenient and abused by too many.
I do think the 5 day Xmas extravaganza is a big mistake and will set things back again, personally I would forgo Christmas this year to avoid more stringent measures in the New Year. A bit of spread with everyone getting together in their ‘limited’ bubbles followed by schools and colleges going back at the coldest time of year, will imho, see a third wave in mid to late January.
You don’t deserve any more than a one word reply you f***ing spannerStill alive to post that drivel. Not such a deadly virus as they make out. To close the whole world over?
Aye mate. Makes sense. f***ing Not.
Wobble.
Oooh ain't I mint? I can say one word replies cos I can I'm git class and that.
Please do Chunky. I look forward to it. But posters such as yourself are too pussy to converse in real talk.
Dr Yeadon is retired. Heard of Barrington Declaration? Thought not.
Your words not mine. They have told you to your face that numbers are manipulated by them. But you carry on.
Like how all positive tests are 93% false. But then go on like idiots following these asymptomatic people. It's just very basic science.
No singing, no monopoly and no hugs I see
Like how all positive tests are 93% false. But then go on like idiots following these asymptomatic people.
Still alive to post that drivel. Not such a deadly virus as they make out. To close the whole world over?
Aye mate. Makes sense. f***ing Not.
If Johnson mandated that every year, it could almost convince me to vote Tory
Good point It is very strange that the fear of god is being put into folk at each and every turn considering....
"But if you repeatedly feel anxious and stressed or it lasts a long time, your body never gets the signal to return to normal functioning. This can weaken your immune system, leaving you more vulnerable to viral infections and frequent illnesses. Also, your regular vaccines may not work as well if you have anxiety."
"When we're stressed, the immune system's ability to fight off antigens is reduced. That is why we are more susceptible to infections"
"Fear weakens our immune system"
You'd have thought they'd be trying not to freak people out
Might be a bit difficult to do that.Jesus. Tell that to at least three/four? posters on here that have died with this virus.
You're the only one running about saying the sky is falling.