• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

CC : Warwickshire v Durham

Parkside said:
Invariably he appears in front of the media at close of play on one of the days.Undoubtedly he would have been involved in the toss decision and so perfectly reasonable to expect an explanation of his reasoning behind the decision in my humble opinion.
On a very flat track I would expect the early order to score big as Warwickshire did.In this situation .Compared to them,our early batting disappointed.
As you're very fond of criticising others' viewpoints might I point out to you,with respect,it is grammatically incorrect to end a sentence with the word like in the context you are using it.
Thank you
Click to expand...

eh?
The Red Telephone said:
To put things into perspective (I think that's what you meant) we scored 517 but had Warwickshire been inclined they could have scored 1000 on that track.
Click to expand...

Our bowling wasnt good enough, thats my point, we kind of gave up
 

MustardAndOnions said:
I’m from Chester I say like most sentences. Pretty sure say Aye instead of yes doesn’t make much grammatical sense either.
Click to expand...
Yes,I fully understand.I agree that Warks bowling was far more disciplined than ours and,of course, we were a strike bowler down but equally our batsmen were out to some very casual shots.The "like" comment was tongue in cheek in response to your constant criticism of my comments
 
Parkside said:
Yes,I fully understand.I agree that Warks bowling was far more disciplined than ours and,of course, we were a strike bowler down but equally our batsmen were out to some very casual shots.The "like" comment was tongue in cheek in response to your constant criticism of my comments
Click to expand...

Ha I’m not criticising you at all like, I enjoy your posts. I think you’re taking them the wrong way. If so I apologize. I like different opinions in cricket it’s good. Just having debate!
 
MustardAndOnions said:
They’ve also bowled too many bad balls

We are behind this game due to our bowling

In my opinion anyway
Click to expand...
We're behind in this game due to our bowling AND batting, we should've cruised past the follow on but brain dead shots gave Warks a sniff of victory.

Despite the awful batting late on yesterday, I'm confident that we have enough about us to comfortably bat the day out
 
Up the rain even the 10 overs second innings was really bad the openers showed no discipline.

To put into context how soft some of dismissals where Yates had 8 first class wickets before this match and a best of 2/45 he has taken 5 wickets in this match for a 150.

The bowling was the worst I can remember in a long time every over contained at least 1 long hop and Carse is simply the most overrated cricketer who has played for the lads in a long time his bowling is wretched.
 
Wait where is the rain

Met office you lie
You must be logged on to see external links


You must be logged on to see media items
 
mackembhoy said:
Wait where is the rain

Met office you lie
You must be logged on to see external links


You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...

Looks like they’ll start on time. If you’d looked only at Warwickshire’s tweet you’d think prospects didn’t look good, it’s all quite strange.
 
brandon said:
Looks like they’ll start on time. If you’d looked only at Warwickshire’s tweet you’d think prospects didn’t look good, it’s all quite strange.
Click to expand...
Difference in communication between the social media channels!

Warks warning fans there might not be play. What a novel idea
 
I'm expecting a defeat.

And I think we should all remember Sussex 2023. One defeat doesn't make a summer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top