The thing is we desperately need a 5th bowler who can do just that. It would be great if he could turn it square or have a mystery ball but when you are relying on 4 right arm medium Pacers even a bowler if Trevaskis style is important especially when you have to bowl 104 overs in a day.
Next home game in the red ball not until September so I'll be there today soaking up the sun in the Trapdoor watching the wickets tumble.
| Name | Matches | Inns | Not Out | Runs | HS | Ave | 100 | 50 | Ct | St |
|
You must be logged on to see external links
| 5 | 7 | 1 | 161 | 46* | 26.83 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
|
You must be logged on to see external links
| 10 | 15 | 3 | 909 | 257 | 75.75 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
|
You must be logged on to see external links
| 10 | 15 | 0 | 343 | 100 | 22.86 | 1 | 0 | 11 | |
| 10 | 14 | 1 | 352 | 102* | 27.07 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||
| 8 | 9 | 2 | 161 | 40* | 23.00 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8* | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 10 | 14 | 1 | 434 | 113* | 33.38 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | 1 | 169 | 78 | 24.14 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 8 | 13 | 1 | 521 | 129 | 43.41 | 1 | 4 | 4 | ||
| 4 | 5 | 1 | 81 | 35 | 20.25 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 8 | 2 | 85 | 52* | 14.16 | 0 | 1 | 22 | ||
| 10 | 11 | 2 | 148 | 59* | 16.44 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 10 | 5 | 86 | 31 | 17.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 4 | 5 | 0 | 75 | 41 | 15.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 30 | 17 | 10.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 | 7 | 0 | 278 | 124 | 39.71 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Worse average than Burnham!
Mostly Notts fans sat where I am and they don't seem to have a clue to their game plan either.
It's a bit weird to be honest. An hour in and I'm none the wiser.
Spot on and then is that it, no second division final and third division final?
Feel justified in my ongoing support for Burnham
Tempered by a couple of hideous decisions that mind. For the second season running we’re seeing the umpires dish out retribution for his previous misdemeanours.
That's it. You carry the points forward from your games v the other team that goes through with you, so we'll be behind Essex at the start, then we play for positions 7th to 12th.
Seems an odd decision, they’re 52 ahead, why not just keep batting until they’re all out? Could get another 20 or 30 but even if they don’t there’s no harm done
I’m still interested in this concept that they’d be tempted to f*ck Warwickshire over given that it would be in their best interests to go through with us as opposed to them. Obviously Warwickshire need to lose for that to come into play like.
Having rechecked the table. If worcs win lose or draw there in group 3 of the next round.Seems an odd decision, they’re 52 ahead, why not just keep batting until they’re all out? Could get another 20 or 30 but even if they don’t there’s no harm done
