• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Best Mag propaganda ever last night

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

dirty bristow

Guest
at work....

One was mouthing off about 5-1 and how it will never be beaten, I said that we won 9-1 and his reply was " Our players went on strike that day and the club had to get people off the street to play, look at the history books, it is in there!"
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 

dirty bristow said:
at work....

One was mouthing off about 5-1 and how it will never be beaten, I said that we won 9-1 and his reply was " Our players went on strike that day and the club had to get people off the street to play, look at the history books, it is in there!"
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
Click to expand...
What is even better about the 1-9 is we 'declared' at 70 minutes, image if it went to 90
 
dirty bristow said:
at work....

One was mouthing off about 5-1 and how it will never be beaten, I said that we won 9-1 and his reply was " Our players went on strike that day and the club had to get people off the street to play, look at the history books, it is in there!"
:lol::lol::lol:
Click to expand...

Is this the same history book that documents the 50,000 at the Gilligham game and The Blue Bell being a Mag stronghold? :lol:
 
:oops::oops::oops::oops:

Its no better of an excuse if he had said "we had a squad full of injuries that day"
 
Newcastle team who played Sunderland in 1-9 defeat:

Lawrence (496)
Whitson (124)
Pudan (24)
Liddell (?)
Veitch (322)
Willis (?)
Duncan (81)
Higgins (150)
Shepherd ( 123)
Wilson (211)
Gosnell (106)

Appearances in brackets
 
dirty bristow said:
Newcastle team who played Sunderland in 1-9 defeat:

Lawrence (496)
Whitson (124)
Pudan (24)
Liddell (?)
Veitch (322)
Willis (?)
Duncan (81)
Higgins (150)
Shepherd ( 123)
Wilson (211)
Gosnell (106)

Age in brackets
Click to expand...

It doesn't look like they took them of the streets, it looks like they took them out the graves. No one alive wants to be seen in a mag shirt.
 
I have a feeling that the scum were top of the first division at the time too...although I am not 100% certain..just rings a bell somewhere, as for being "on strike"...yeah right, footballers were forever going on strike! :lol:
 
What is more important here?

The win of 9-1 or the final league placing at the end of the season?

Just so I know like.
 
Neil Martin said:
I have a feeling that the scum were top of the first division at the time too...although I am not 100% certain..just rings a bell somewhere, as for being "on strike"...yeah right, footballers were forever going on strike! :lol:
Click to expand...

Bastards won the league that year:eek:
 
Sima said:
What is more important here?

The win of 9-1 or the final league placing at the end of the season?

Just so I know like.
Click to expand...

Suppose you could argue that of last season too.
 
dirty bristow said:
Newcastle team who played Sunderland in 1-9 defeat:

Lawrence (496)
Whitson (124)
Pudan (24)
Liddell (?)
Veitch (322)
Willis (?)
Duncan (81)
Higgins (150)
Shepherd ( 123)
Wilson (211)
Gosnell (106)

Appearances in brackets
Click to expand...

But thats where your arguement falls down, every mag I know has attended more games than they really have. I'm sure the players do the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top