Ben Foakes

If it wasn’t for potentially missing the NZ matches, I’d continue to play Buttler (and everyone knows I’m not a red ball fan). He’s deserved it, and we want a side where performance = being picked

For what it’s worth, I don’t think you can pick both. Root, Stokes and Pope are 4-6 for me. Others will disagree

Genuine question, I’ve not been on the Cricket forum for a while bar the odd comment here and there, do you not think there’s any scope for Root batting at 3?
 


Genuine question, I’ve not been on the Cricket forum for a while bar the odd comment here and there, do you not think there’s any scope for Root batting at 3?
Whilst captaining, no. He clearly doesn’t want to, and it exposes him too early with our weak openers.

His record at 3 is sub 40, vs 54 at 4 and 60 plus at 5.

Kohli and Smith don’t bat 3, and they play in generally friendlier batting conditions. Williamson still does it, but there is a dearth of openers these days, it’s easier for Ponting following Hayden and Langer I guess!
 
Whilst captaining, no. He clearly doesn’t want to, and it exposes him too early with our weak openers.

His record at 3 is sub 40, vs 54 at 4 and 60 plus at 5.

Kohli and Smith don’t bat 3, and they play in generally friendlier batting conditions. Williamson still does it, but there is a dearth of openers these days, it’s easier for Ponting following Hayden and Langer I guess!

So certainly not for the next 2 years (presumably Root will be given this series in Australia this winter and the summer of 2023?) Next captain in your opinion? I’ll hang my hat on Stokes or Pope.
 
Can’t see anyone aside from Stokes. Will be too early for Pope. Buttler if he keeps his place is the other possibility

Think Pope could have an outside chance, more likely Stokes though. It’s like you say, there’s not many other candidates. Buttler if he is still around (see the Foakes conversation we’re having) but I’d say Stokes.
 
Jos Buttler is absolutely mint, and was brilliant last year

he is absolutely our number 1

However, if he missed 5 tests in a row, then he gives up his place 100% for me.

Ben Foakes is canny, but he might be a sub continential specialist, we don't know

You dont really need an expert up to the stumps in England or Australia like

IMO the Aussies will hope we dont play Bairstow or Buttler in the Ashes.

I'd put my life savings on Buttler being our keeper in the Ashes though, so I think this thread is a lot of hot air for nothing

People are very reactionary like, Foakes has a goodgame with the gloves, then suddenly he has to play over Buttler, despite the fact he has been fantastic, with the gloves, and with the bat, for a year.

Take a step back and look at how well England have been playing, we have been tremendous for a period now, and were top of the test champ, albeit briefly, after the 1st test.
More stumpings in one innings than Buttler has in 50 tests.

I mean Buttler never kept in asia before Sri Lanka like,

bit of a meaningless stat
Root & Buttler- Best Marras

That is all.

That isnt remotely why buttler is in the team like
If it wasn’t for potentially missing the NZ matches, I’d continue to play Buttler (and everyone knows I’m not a red ball fan). He’s deserved it, and we want a side where performance = being picked

For what it’s worth, I don’t think you can pick both. Root, Stokes and Pope are 4-6 for me. Others will disagree

Agree aye, we cant go back down the route of that, moving people around, playing 2 keepers, all rounders up the order etc

you know my feeling on it, England totally and utterly messed Bairstow and Mo Ali around, they batted almost a different position every game,

They were genuinelly world class at 7 and 8.

Buttler is in as keeper or not in the side.

I am with you, he is deservedly our first choice, but I dont think a player can miss 5 tests in a row and walk back in the side, just sends out the totally wrong message to me.
Seperate point, maybe a diffs thread needed, barely any players in the las 20 years have averaged over 40 at 6

I think its Matthews, the lad from Pakistan (forget his name shiraz?) and Laxman

So Pope at 6 long term? I mean its not the done thing in test cricket, he bats there basically as our all rounder bats at 5 though tbg
 
Last edited:
Jos Buttler is absolutely mint, and was brilliant last year

he is absolutely our number 1

However, if he missed 5 tests in a row, then he gives up his place 100% for me.

Ben Foakes is canny, but he might be a sub continential specialist, we don't know

You dont really need an expert up to the stumps in England or Australia like

IMO the Aussies will hope we dont play Bairstow or Buttler in the Ashes.

I'd put my life savings on Buttler being our keeper in the Ashes though, so I think this thread is a lot of hot air for nothing

People are very reactionary like, Foakes has a goodgame with the gloves, then suddenly he has to play over Buttler, despite the fact he has been fantastic, with the gloves, and with the bat, for a year.

Take a step back and look at how well England have been playing, we have been tremendous for a period now, and were top of the test champ, albeit briefly, after the 1st test.


I mean Buttler never kept in asia before Sri Lanka like,

bit of a meaningless stat


That isnt remotely why buttler is in the team like


Agree aye, we cant go back down the route of that, moving people around, playing 2 keepers, all rounders up the order etc

you know my feeling on it, England totally and utterly messed Bairstow and Mo Ali around, they batted almost a different position every game,

They were genuinelly world class at 7 and 8.

Buttler is in as keeper or not in the side.

I am with you, he is deservedly our first choice, but I dont think a player can miss 5 tests in a row and walk back in the side, just sends out the totally wrong message to me.
Seperate point, maybe a diffs thread needed, barely any players in the las 20 years have averaged over 40 at 6

I think its Matthews, the lad from Pakistan (forget his name shiraz?) and Laxman

So Pope at 6 long term? I mean its not the done thing in test cricket, he bats there basically as our all rounder bats at 5 though tbg
Nah I don’t think Pope is long term at 6. But he’s clearly a special talent, and it would be horrific to put him at 3 this early. Would be just what we did to Ramprakash
 
We really need to address the number 3 slot, if we accept the openers are generally lacking something.

Currently Crawley/Lawrence aren't established at 3, which means we don't get to Test Match quality batsmen until Root comes in at 4.

Who would be number 3 ? Bairstow has the ability but he's had so many chances and is now without a central contract. Foakes, without the gloves is as good an option as any.

Ideally it would be Root, but I accept while he has the captaincy it's unlikely and probably unwise.

It's a puzzler as we have the right 4-6 and one of Buttler/Foakes at 7. We just need to get the top 3 sorted .... and fast
 
We really need to address the number 3 slot, if we accept the openers are generally lacking something.

Currently Crawley/Lawrence aren't established at 3, which means we don't get to Test Match quality batsmen until Root comes in at 4.

Who would be number 3 ? Bairstow has the ability but he's had so many chances and is now without a central contract. Foakes, without the gloves is as good an option as any.

Ideally it would be Root, but I accept while he has the captaincy it's unlikely and probably unwise.

It's a puzzler as we have the right 4-6 and one of Buttler/Foakes at 7. We just need to get the top 3 sorted .... and fast
Foakes without the gloves would be crazy, it’d be like playing Messi but in goal.

Bairstow I can see playing 3 in Asia, but he’s too loose elsewhere.

I think it will be Crawley in the medium term. Sibley looks promising, but Burns really needs runs
 
Foakes without the gloves would be crazy, it’d be like playing Messi but in goal.

Personally I think he's the best wk/batsmen, but he needs to prove it.

I don't think it would be fair on him to take the Alec Stewart role and bat in top 3, if keeping wk.

I was only thinking of a way to get the best available option in at 3.

Regarding Pope at 6 or whatever. I think he needs nurturing at this satge of his career, like Ian Bell was. If he stays 6 forever he'll get accused of 'easy runs' but I don't think he warrants moving around because of other deficiencies just yet
 
Best wicket keeper against spin in the world. Not so sure about pace, standing up to Stuart Broad was a bit arrogant and cost a nailed on catch that Buttler would have taken
 
After the year Buttler has had with both runs and improvement of his keeping it should not even be a debate whether he should be in side, not only has he scored runs he looked so good playing a big part in wining tests batting in the fourth innings of a couple of matches.
 
Best wicket keeper against spin in the world. Not so sure about pace, standing up to Stuart Broad was a bit arrogant and cost a nailed on catch that Buttler would have taken
Yeah. But the argument to counter that is that he was standing up to stop them leaving the crease. So the shot was based on the foot position
After the year Buttler has had with both runs and improvement of his keeping it should not even be a debate whether he should be in side, not only has he scored runs he looked so good playing a big part in wining tests batting in the fourth innings of a couple of matches.
What’s your view on if he skips the NZ series to play IPL?
 
After the year Buttler has had with both runs and improvement of his keeping it should not even be a debate whether he should be in side, not only has he scored runs he looked so good playing a big part in wining tests batting in the fourth innings of a couple of matches.

Agreed but not if missed NZ

I’ve a limit. And that’s it

despite what we’ve been spun, it’s not 100% vital he plays all the IPL
 
I think we agree. I’m all for family time. But this becomes cash at the expense of international cricket (and let’s be honest, they’ve got a few years out of it now)

For sure. I’m up for players playing for IPL like, always supported it, almost going back to KP, just don’t push it. I don’t see why he can’t just play like even 75% of it. Can’t be that much to ask. ECB pay him a fortune

I’m actually boring myself talking about it now mind. Probs better to talk about whose playing rather than who isn’t for next few tests.
 
We really need to address the number 3 slot, if we accept the openers are generally lacking something.

Currently Crawley/Lawrence aren't established at 3, which means we don't get to Test Match quality batsmen until Root comes in at 4.

Who would be number 3 ? Bairstow has the ability but he's had so many chances and is now without a central contract. Foakes, without the gloves is as good an option as any.

Ideally it would be Root, but I accept while he has the captaincy it's unlikely and probably unwise.

It's a puzzler as we have the right 4-6 and one of Buttler/Foakes at 7. We just need to get the top 3 sorted .... and fast
Crawley scored massive double ton at 3.

He's not had the chance to cement himself that spot due to burns missing Sri Lanka and then getting injured.

If he then comes back in he's gonna be opening if they play Bairstow at 3
 

Back
Top