theoracle71
New Member
Club never paid for players. Funded through sponsors by cricket themselves.So no more paid players at the cricket club?
Over seas pro? Is times that tough?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Club never paid for players. Funded through sponsors by cricket themselves.So no more paid players at the cricket club?
Over seas pro? Is times that tough?
Last I heard it was pretty much done.Heard a rumour that the bar takeover has been approved. Can anyone confirm?
Only one offer on the table now, after the alternative/preferred loan fell through.Anybody got an update on this situation?
What is the offer / proposal?Only one offer on the table now, after the alternative/preferred loan fell through.
Still needs clearing from a legal perspective and by the charity commission before it can be voted through, but will most likely happen.
One of the members to buy the Ashbrooke building for the ridiculously low £300k, so that the club can pay off immediate debt. The club would have an agreed buyback date in 3 years time - which would rely on land that the club own at Burdon Lane being sold. The member would be entitled to take out certain funds raised by the club in these 3 years for personal gain.What is the offer / proposal?
That can't end badly at all.One of the members to buy the Ashbrooke building for the ridiculously low £300k, so that the club can pay off immediate debt. The club would have an agreed buyback date in 3 years time - which would rely on land that the club own at Burdon Lane being sold. The member would be entitled to take out certain funds raised by the club in these 3 years for personal gain.
The individual sections would be expected to fund their own costs -groundsman etc - which screws over cricket and bowls more than the others. This is where the legal part comes in, as part of the club being a charity, it has to abide by the constitution set out which states that the cost of facilitating the sports is on the central club rather than the sections.
In the meantime, the bar would be leased out, and funds raised from this would pay for renovations at the club.
Sounds like it'll go tits up, unfortunatelyOne of the members to buy the Ashbrooke building for the ridiculously low £300k, so that the club can pay off immediate debt. The club would have an agreed buyback date in 3 years time - which would rely on land that the club own at Burdon Lane being sold. The member would be entitled to take out certain funds raised by the club in these 3 years for personal gain.
The individual sections would be expected to fund their own costs -groundsman etc - which screws over cricket and bowls more than the others. This is where the legal part comes in, as part of the club being a charity, it has to abide by the constitution set out which states that the cost of facilitating the sports is on the central club rather than the sections.
In the meantime, the bar would be leased out, and funds raised from this would pay for renovations at the club.
Which is a massive concern for 3 out of the 4 main sport sections at the club, judging by opinions at the recent EGM.Sounds like it'll go tits up, unfortunately
Membership fees, fundraising and some level of volunteering. May suffice short term but unsustainable over a period of time.Sounds like the next few years will be a real struggle for different sections. The costs to run the cricket must be sizeable, how on earth will they fund this themselves? A groundsman is not cheap, player costs again are not cheap as well as umpires, cricket balls etc.
Couldn’t run the cricket club I’m secretary of without funds from the clubhouse. Bar takings and event bookings keep the club solvent. Interesting times ahead given how much cricketers are asking to be paid these days.Sounds like the next few years will be a real struggle for different sections. The costs to run the cricket must be sizeable, how on earth will they fund this themselves? A groundsman is not cheap, player costs again are not cheap as well as umpires, cricket balls etc. Will Mr Applegarth be plugging the financial gap again?
Sounds like you’re completely against this. What was/is the alternative option?One of the members to buy the Ashbrooke building for the ridiculously low £300k, so that the club can pay off immediate debt. The club would have an agreed buyback date in 3 years time - which would rely on land that the club own at Burdon Lane being sold. The member would be entitled to take out certain funds raised by the club in these 3 years for personal gain.
The individual sections would be expected to fund their own costs -groundsman etc - which screws over cricket and bowls more than the others. This is where the legal part comes in, as part of the club being a charity, it has to abide by the constitution set out which states that the cost of facilitating the sports is on the central club rather than the sections.
In the meantime, the bar would be leased out, and funds raised from this would pay for renovations at the club.
I believe this to be incorrect. The funds taken will be used to service the cost of raising the initial money. I may be wrong, but my source in normally solid. The member would be entitled to take out certain funds raised by the club in these 3 years for personal gain.
It still baffles me how cricket players are even paid at such a low level.Couldn’t run the cricket club I’m secretary of without funds from the clubhouse. Bar takings and event bookings keep the club solvent. Interesting times ahead given how much cricketers are asking to be paid these days.
Exactly, mate. Live within your means.It still baffles me how cricket players are even paid at such a low level.
That is part of it through existing lease deals with the gym and physio, but any excess from the football pitch or additional revenue raised through other channels would still go away from the club too.I believe this to be incorrect. The funds taken will be used to service the cost of raising the initial money. I may be wrong, but my source in normally solid
I'm wary of it for sure. The whole plan is reliant on a land sale, that hasn't sold for the past decade.Sounds like you’re completely against this. What was/is the alternative option?