Antibody 47D11........

Status
Not open for further replies.
MackemX said:
If you say something is rubbish like you just did simply because of 1 newspaper the OP linked to, ignoring the fact other news websites are also reporting it, then I'll point it out and even give you the source of the story and also for the benefit of others.
Click to expand...

You'll suffer for that mind :)
 


MackemX said:
What has the Daily Mail got to do with anything regarding this news being rubbish? :confused:

How about this article then?
www.uu.nl

Researchers report discovery of antibody that blocks infection by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in cells

Research Published Initial Step Towards Developing Fully Human Antibody Therapeutics and Diagnostics for Respiratory Disease COVID-19
www.uu.nl www.uu.nl

Or this publication?
www.nature.com

A human monoclonal antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection - Nature Communications

Vaccines and targeted therapeutics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are currently lacking. Here, the authors report a human monoclonal antibody capable of neutralizing both authentic SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 by targeting a common epitope.
www.nature.com www.nature.com

Or this report linked on that publication?

Is that the rubbish the Daily Mail is reporting about?
Click to expand...
The article is from the dm and nature.com claiming they have found a cure for the corona virus. The only time a cure for the corona virus should be mentioned is from gov.uk. I prefer to be able to post my opinion without having to waste my time having to justify every post I make thank you.
niceonemarra said:
The article is from the dm and nature.com claiming they have found a cure for the corona virus. The only time a cure for the corona virus should be mentioned is from gov.uk. I prefer to be able to post my opinion without having to waste my time having to justify every post I make thank you.
Click to expand...
That's because I oppose the figures which I have a right to do under the freedom of speech act Article 10: Freedom of expression | Equality and Human Rights Commission

Article 10 protects your right to hold your own opinions and to express them freely without government interference.

This includes the right to express your views aloud (for example through public protest and demonstrations) or through:

  • published articles, books or leaflets
  • television or radio broadcasting
  • works of art
  • the internet and social media


If you need a footy forum to understand government figures then something isn't right.
If people want to spend the day attacking anyone who disagrees with them then that is the reason the thread has turned into petty bickering.
edit: My second post was meant for another thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
niceonemarra said:
The article is from the dm and nature.com claiming they have found a cure for the corona virus. The only time a cure for the corona virus should be mentioned is from gov.uk. I prefer to be able to post my opinion without having to waste my time having to justify every post I make thank you.

That's because I oppose the figures which I have a right to do under the freedom of speech act Article 10: Freedom of expression | Equality and Human Rights Commission

Article 10 protects your right to hold your own opinions and to express them freely without government interference.

This includes the right to express your views aloud (for example through public protest and demonstrations) or through:

  • published articles, books or leaflets
  • television or radio broadcasting
  • works of art
  • the internet and social media


If you need a footy forum to understand government figures then something isn't right.
If people want to spend the day attacking anyone who disagrees with them then that is the reason the thread has turned into petty bickering.
edit: My second post was meant for another thread.
Click to expand...

Where's the restriction on freedom of speech? This sounds pretty serious.
 
sambantam82 said:
Where's the restriction on freedom of speech? This sounds pretty serious.
Click to expand...
Yes it it serious to have freedom of speech removed.
On the figures thread, not only was I attacked for saying I think the figures are wrong I also got a warning for it which I have appealed and I'm waiting for a reply from the gaffer.
 
In general most scientists consider Nature to be a good journal. Getting a paper published in Nature is something for the CV. They are only reporting very early work - antibodies take weeks to make and need a lot of testing to prove specificity which takes months. If they’ve made this since the outbreak the paper has really been rushed out.
 
maghater said:
got me hopes out, then realised it was the DAILY FAIL REPORTING IT 😐
Click to expand...

I don't understand this mindset. Surely in order to verify the validity of a report then you take the time to take a look at where they got their source. Then you can make an informed judgement on reliability.
 
sambantam82 said:
I don't understand this mindset. Surely in order to verify the validity of a report then you take the time to take a look at where they got their source. Then you can make an informed judgement on reliability.
Click to expand...
Don't understand people that have a completely closed mind and don't understand sarcasm, still I suppose it takes allsorts, I assume you are like the round coconut one that is always the last one to get eaten.
 
maghater said:
Don't understand people that have a completely closed mind and don't understand sarcasm, still I suppose it takes allsorts, I assume you are like the round coconut one that is always the last one to get eaten.
Click to expand...

Sorry didn't realise you were joking about the story in the daily mail being unreliable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top